Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've been using VMware Fusion and keeping my VMs on an external firewire drive. The problem is, whenever I create a new VM, it insists on creating it on my main drive and I can then move it over to the external drive.

With VMware WorkStation, you could configure a directory for new VMs, but I don't see anything like that for Fusion. Is there an option like that?

share|improve this question
This should be on – Spencer Ruport Jul 17 '09 at 22:17
Why? Do only sysadmins use VMWare Fusion? – Mark Jul 17 '09 at 22:28
No, VMWare Fusion is the OSX version of WMWare Workstation. It is not a server product. – Ferruccio Jul 17 '09 at 22:34
up vote 3 down vote accepted

As per this article VMWare Fusion will prompt you were to save the Virtual Machine during creation. If I recall in VMWare Fusion 2.0 you could specify this under preferences.

share|improve this answer

THere is a Customize Settings option on the Finish step of the New Machine creation wizard. From there you can specify where you want the VM to reside.

share|improve this answer

This is not technically an answer...

I recommend creating all virtual machines in /Users/Shared and then applying permissions to the individual folders (i.e. the individual VMs). This has several advantages:

  1. VMs don't take up room in the home directory.

  2. /Users/Shared can be excluded from Time Machine since VMs shouldn't be backed up using Time Machine anyway.

  3. VMs can easily be shared between users on the same Mac. Just create a group for VM users and change the group of the VMs to that group to assign permissions.

  4. It's a clean solution.

Better yet, use a second hard disk for VMs if you can.

I have three VMs (Vista 64, XP 32, SuSE Linux 64) and they are all located on the second internal hard disk which isn't being backed up by Time Machine either.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .