Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Google declared their free DNS service, Google public DNS:

To try it out: Configure your network settings to use the IP addresses and as your DNS servers.

They claim that:

By using Google Public DNS you can:

  • Speed up your browsing experience.
  • Improve your security.
  • Get the results you expect with absolutely no redirection.

What do you think about it? Should I use those DNS servers? One reason to use them is I cannot open the web sites banned by the government (such as YouTube!).

share|improve this question
Also, they have as another DNS – Dan McClain Dec 4 '09 at 12:13
2 isn't responding to pings or DNS requests for me as of 9/6/10. – Reid Sep 6 '10 at 19:32
up vote 8 down vote accepted

A quick comparison of Google Public DNS with OpenDNS (which has been around for a long time).

If you have to access sites banned by Google DNS (or, OpenDNS for that matter), you can skip these configurations when you hit a problem. However, most of the time sites blocked by OpenDNS (and, I have to still look at Google Public DNS more) are those which I would never want to go to.

Update based on your comments on YouTube in other answers.
If YouTube is really banned by your ISP (or higher authorities), changing to another DNS will usually not help (unless this 'ban' is very weakly implemented). You would need to investigate tunneling techniques to bypass such bans.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the great article! – Mehper C. Palavuzlar Dec 4 '09 at 13:45
I tried both OpenDNS and Google public DNS. The result is, both opens YouTube. – Mehper C. Palavuzlar Dec 4 '09 at 14:01

Using google as DNS would mean they will see ANY DNS search or in other words they would know about any site you (likely) went to and so you provide them with a LOT of somewhat personal info, which they could collate with the other info they gather on you, make sure you are fine with that and be aware that if the law changes or there is some subpoena they could then be handing that info over to authorities who as you know will 'use anything you say against you'.

share|improve this answer

Try using Namebench to see if it is faster for your location

share|improve this answer
Great app! Thanks. – Mehper C. Palavuzlar Sep 6 '10 at 20:19
Installing namebench using repository sudo apt-get install namebench – 465544 Jun 22 '13 at 7:33

If you can open all the sites you want then yes.

If you can't open some sites you have to be able to access then no.

Note, I'm not saying that just because Google implements your governments banned list you shouldn't use it. I don't know what sites are on the list (nor do I wish to investigate from work), but I could see that you might have a legitimate reason for wanted to view those sites (university research say).

share|improve this answer
One of the banned sites is YouTube. Think about the rest... – Mehper C. Palavuzlar Dec 4 '09 at 13:38

If you are worried about Google Public DNS security please read this article:

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the link. Great charts and data! – Mehper C. Palavuzlar Dec 8 '09 at 11:38

I tried it last night, but noticed it was slower than Level3 DNS, so I switched back this morning. I think it depends on your location. I'm in the east coast, so I think that's why I notice better performance with Level3.

I had the same experience when I tried OpenDNS, noticing Level3 was faster. Plus I didn't like some of the redirection OpenDNS does. I don't want my DNS thinking for me. :) Just fast.

share|improve this answer
It's slightly faster over here in England. – Phoshi Dec 4 '09 at 18:01

I did speed comparisons 3 times during the day and night yesterday, and both my ISP's DNS, and Level3 came back as faster than Google DNS.

share|improve this answer

I recently have to use because I have AT&T as my Internet Service Provider.

When you try to navigate to sites like https://internal/ AT&T automatically redirects you to

That is the way their default routing works.

To work around that I use as my DNS server so that I can navigate successfully.

share|improve this answer

I think you should just use it if it really improve your productivity on the internet. But if you need to go to the sites banned by the government then don't use it.

share|improve this answer
Our pragmatist government banned YouTube. I have to do something ;) – Mehper C. Palavuzlar Dec 4 '09 at 13:41
@mepher - ugly, you should definitely do something – Nicu Zecheru Dec 8 '09 at 10:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .