48

A 32-bit kernel (x86) can only run 32-bit code. A 64-bit kernel (x86_64) can run both 32-bit and 64-bit code.

I'd like to know if a machine can run an executable: In other words, I have a binary file and I have to run it on a 32-bit Ubuntu, but I don't know if the binary file is an 32-bit executable.

I used the file command, specifying the executable to be checked and this was the returned result:

ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, BuildID[sha1]=0x7329fa71323a6cd64823c2594338682065cd6e07, not stripped

3 Answers 3

46

The answer to the question in the title is right there at the beginning of the output:

ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64

ELF is the Executable and Linkable Format, the binary executable file format most commonly used by Linux.

x86-64 is the architecture of the binary, the 64-bit version of the x86 instruction set originally introduced by AMD. For reasons that are beyond me, Microsoft refers to it as "x64", but that's the same thing.

If you need to know the architecture of the kernel itself, you can use uname -mpi. For example, on my system, that prints:

x86_64 unknown unknown

which means that I am running an x86-64 kernel.

If you're interested in the CPU itself, look at /proc/cpuinfo for details about the CPU(s) detected by the Linux kernel.

A 32-bit 80x86 executable is identified by file as, for example:

ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, stripped

which tells us that it's a 32-bit executable using the Intel 80386 instruction set (possibly with extensions).

Note that it isn't quite as simple as 32-bit versus 64-bit architectures. For example, the Linux kernel supports 32-bit architectures like Intel 80386, AVR32, S/390 and Unicore32. On the 64-bit side of things, Linux is usable on PA-RISC, x86-64, Itanium and Alpha, among others. Not all distributions provide binaries for all architectures, however (and I doubt there are any distributions that target all supported CPU architectures equally). So if you want to know whether a given binary will be executable on a given system, you need to consider the architecture, rather than the CPU's native word size.

6
  • 2
    "reasons that are beyond me". I still remember the day I found out that x64 was 64 bits and x86 was 32 bits. Aug 24, 2014 at 5:32
  • 1
    @PaulDraper The term "x86" has a clear etymology; it dates back to the 80x86 series CPUs from Intel, differentiating them from their predecessors like the 8008 or 8080, and these days most often refers to the 32-bit (IA-32 instruction set) capable variants (80386, 80486, Pentium and newer). These more recent model numbers were often abbreviated by omitting the "80" at the beginning, so (implied 32-bit) x86 matches 386, 486, etc. However, I'm not aware of any 64-bit CPUs with model numbers of a similar structure ending in "64"; certainly neither AMD nor Intel use such a naming scheme today.
    – user
    Mar 27, 2016 at 13:15
  • Though x64 is a very common term. Random example: microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=42482 Mar 27, 2016 at 18:52
  • @PaulDraper It's common now in the Microsoft world, but its etymology remains unclear in a way that that for "x86" does not.
    – user
    Mar 28, 2016 at 8:47
  • Microsoft refers to x86_64 as AMD64 in their installers
    – phuclv
    Nov 14, 2017 at 1:15
16

The 5th byte of a Linux binary executable file (ELF format, see Wikipedia) is 1 for a 32 bit executable, 2 for a 64 bit executable.

To see this for a program named "foo", type at the command line

od -t x1 -t c foo | head -n 2
2
  • Is this just for x86?
    – MrMesees
    Jun 2, 2020 at 9:04
  • Useful! Thanks for the answer!
    – Xebozone
    Jan 6, 2022 at 10:18
15

If you want to avoid the 'head' pipe, you can do

od -An -t x1 -j 4 -N 1 foo

This will print 01 if foo is a 32-bit binary and 02 if it's 64. It may still include some leading spaces - worth knowing if you're doing any automated comparisons on the results.

If found this useful in a basic Ubuntu Docker container where 'file' was not installed.

1
  • Even more useful! Thanks!
    – Xebozone
    Jan 6, 2022 at 10:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .