Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've used macports for a long time. But recently I'm considering switch to pkgsrc. I thought pkgsrc is for NetBSD only so I just ignore it. But recently I've found out that pkgsrc makes a lot of effort to make its package profile portable accross multiple unices (including Linux, DragonFly BSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Mac OS X).

pros of pkgsrc:

  • more packages
  • much stable maintained (NetBSD seems having more manpower of packagers)
  • have releases, current and work-in-progress (while Macports is always work-in-progress, no stable release)

pros of macports:

  • more customization for Mac OS X

So does anyone have experiences on using pkgsrc on Mac OS X? I'd like to hear you opinions.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

I personally use MacPorts, since I'm used to it and understand where files can be found to subsequently install non-MacPorts applications with dependencies. However, the article Use the NetBSD excellent pkgsrc packages collection on Mac OS X describes using pkgsrc in a contained disk image, so that it doesn't interfere at all with your main OS X installation, and you can move it around from system to system!

I also found a discussion thread with a positive mention of pkgsrc on 10.5 at least.

This should provide more info to help you make a decision, although it's not a definite vote for either package manager.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you plan on testing pkgsrc, check pkgin (apt like tool for pkgsrc). http://imil.net/pkgin/

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.