Why not ~/dls instead of ~/Downloads?

Question

Most folder names in the *nix world are lower case. It makes them easier to type in my opinion. However, everything in my home-dir is capitalized! Why is this? Is it possible to change them?

The only solution I have come up with so far is putting soft links in my home dir for each folder with lower case names.

ln -s ~/Downloads dls

Furthermore, doesn't it seem weird that there are no abbreviations in the home dir? I'm used to folder names like dev, lib, tmp, var, or usr. That's right, we want to save one keystroke by shortening user to usr and three on binary to bin, but Downloads can't be shortened to dls.

Which of the following looks more like a *nix directory structure to you?

Desktop Documents Downloads Music Pictures Public Templates Videos

or

desk docs dls music img pub templates vids

Is there a reason for this inconsistency or is this just a legacy issue?

Answer 1

Which of the following looks more like a *nix directory structure to you?

I suspect the mainstream distros these days are more concerned with the question "which of the following is the slightest bit user-friendly?" Linux distributions like Fedora and Ubuntu are attempting to attract mainstream, non-programmer users, and things like this are a good step in that direction.

bin, lib, tmp, usr, etc. are generally not exposed to average (i.e. "my mother") users, so leaving them abbreviated doesn't harm usability. The home directory, though, is something that every user is going to encounter, so it makes sense to have it easily human-readable.

Answer 2

If I look at my home folder, I see countless folders and files starting with a dot and consisting mostly of lowercase letters. I don’t like having this mess in the home folder and seeing these capitalised folders gives me a comforting feeling that it is possible to organise and structure things in a good way.

Don’t see anything wrong with capitalised folders at all. But then, I also use spaces and unicode characters for files when it makes things more readable.

Answer 3

It's easy to make the directories in the home directory space more user friendly because probably nothing cares what they are called except a few end user programs in KDE or Gnome. You can't do similar things to something like /usr or /etc because there are literally thousands of programs that may or may not break if you made that change.

Answer 4

Most people seem to like it when it's very clear what a directory is for - would you know what a dls directory was for if you hadn't created it yourself?

These directories you describe, with the exception of Desktop, aren't actually needed by any software I have come across. You can just rename them and any software you use tends to remember the directory you last used.

The difference between Desktop and desk is just one keypress if you are using bash tab-completion, for all the Windows-converts who are scared of the big black box of a shell prompt it makes absolutely no difference time-wise and it is much more user-friendly. I think one extra keypress is worth this user-friendlyness.

Answer 5

This may have become widespread first on Mac OS X, which mixed the "cryptic" Unixy stuff with the more "user-friendly" names; not only in each user's directory, but at the root: /System, /Applications, etc. I find it to be a useful distinction.

Answer 6

I'd rather suspect that the big name distros are more concered with the question "which of the following is the most Windows/Mac like".

Answer 7

You can use xdg-user-dirs to tell applications to use your shortened names. There are some apps that forget to check if the locations are non-standard, but since it's an i18n issue you should get a good response if you file bugs.

Answer 8

Because it's Linux. If you don't like the way a distro does something, you're encouraged (that is, expected) to create your own.

Answer 9

You might find this site interesting: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard).