| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | France | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 2 years, 5 months |
| seen | May 21 at 13:49 | |
| stats | profile views | 12 |
|
May 14 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 15 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 15 |
asked | writing documentation exportable to RSS and to a publication file |
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
Efficiently extracting a few data from a large XML file The solution with iterparse works great. It improved the parsing time by at least an order of magnitude. I stumble, however, on a problem but I will open a separate question |
|
Feb 2 |
accepted | Efficiently extracting a few data from a large XML file |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
Efficiently extracting a few data from a large XML file No, I am not. Thanks for the hint -- I will read & implement and be back with feedback (and mark the question as answered) |
|
Jan 30 |
asked | Efficiently extracting a few data from a large XML file |
|
Jan 3 |
comment |
Outlook 2010: automatic category assignment for meetings @CharlieRB:with all due respect - the question is asked correctly. It states the problem, a sought solution similar to an existing feature in Outlook (as well as some nice-to-have) and asks for a direction to look at. I dod not find anything interesting, otherwise I would have stated it (I am not Edison to state all that failed :)) |
|
Jan 2 |
comment |
Outlook 2010: automatic category assignment for meetings @CharlieRB: I could not find anything out of the box (having looked around Outlook). The closest I got to was to use a Rule (on new email) but this is very limited (only applies to new meetings, is not dynamic upon changes, limited granularity on conditions (pertinent to a meeting - participants for instance)). As I mentioned I am looking for pointers towards a reasonable direction from someone who is more knowledgable than me in Outlook. |
|
Jan 2 |
asked | Outlook 2010: automatic category assignment for meetings |
|
Dec 28 |
comment |
WiFi synchronization speed lowered on heavy traffic on mobiles @techie007: yes, no matter if there is one or more devices. I tried switching channels, switching from n to g etc. This is why I belive this is not a network congestion:interference issue |
|
Dec 28 |
asked | WiFi synchronization speed lowered on heavy traffic on mobiles |
|
Dec 28 |
answered | Very high latencies with WiFi |
|
Dec 13 |
asked | Mounting Google Driva via WebDav directly on Google |
|
Aug 28 |
awarded | Tumbleweed |
|
Aug 8 |
revised |
How do I detect SD card insertion (just the SD card, not the card reader) in Linux? bug submitted |
|
Aug 8 |
revised |
How do I detect SD card insertion (just the SD card, not the card reader) in Linux? edit in main question |
|
Aug 8 |
revised |
How do I detect SD card insertion (just the SD card, not the card reader) in Linux? the questions stays unanswered until a bug filed with Debian is not closed |
|
Aug 8 |
comment |
How do I detect SD card insertion (just the SD card, not the card reader) in Linux? @darnir: what message do you get? Something similar to Piskvor's one (above) |
|
Aug 8 |
comment |
How do I detect SD card insertion (just the SD card, not the card reader) in Linux? @Piskvor: ah this is interesting. Which kernel are you on? I log everything and do not see this kind of message |