3

The question is not as simple as the title suggests. I am not a newbie in tech at least as per my experience. But not much experience in Linux.

The basic difference is the UI between all linux distros. So one should choose any distro just based on just the UI. What makes a distro different than the other? When every linux software works on any distribution then why is it suggested at so many places to choose Ubuntu instead of elementary OS.? Even if Ubuntu software store has more apps but those apps can still be installed on eOS. apt get install should install any package available in Ubuntu in eOS too.

Can someone explain how a distro differs from another distro. Exclude UI, stability, personal preference etc.

Mainly capability of a distro. For example how Ubuntu is more capable than say eOS or any other example. How their capabilities differ?

2
  • Welcome to SuperUser. One of our sister sites is dedicated to Linux and Unix topics, and similar questions have actually been asked before. One of the best resources on StackExchanges sites is to search them for pre-existing questions similar to your own. unix.stackexchange.com . For instance, if I Google "site:unix.stackexchange.com differences between distro distribution" then I get several very useful results. May 15, 2020 at 20:33
  • Thank you for your input. Though I have searched on this topic before posting but I'll try exactly your search suggestion. Appreciate you.
    – Pera
    May 15, 2020 at 20:38

2 Answers 2

1

Your lost starts off with a lot if incorrect assumptions/assertions,

  The basic difference is the UI between all linux distros.

No, in many cases this is not a factor, and many distros will allow you to install different guis. Also, the question faces people installing servers that don't have a GUI at all.

  When every linux software works on any distribution then why is it suggested at so many places to choose Ubuntu instead of elementary OS.?

This is not practically true - most popular software will work on most general purpose distros, but things like kernels and libraries can make it hard to impossible to install some software on some distros.

The biggest differences between distros are the people behind them, the level of support, package management, environment management and support. Really the only significant difference between VentIS and RHEL is support.

Distros like Ubuntu and its variants may have lots of packages and be easy to use with a GUI, while systems like RHEL are about long term compatibility - focussing more effort on stability and longevity.

That's not to say any 1 distro us the best - I run Ubuntu on my desktop and CentOS on some of my servers. Of-course when it comes to derivatives of the most popular distros there is less to differentiate them.

-1

The main differences are in the package management (e.g. rpm, deb) and the way some of the configuration is stored (e.g. Fedora and derived distributions like RedHat and CentOS keep most of the startup related configuration in /etc/sysconfig).

Most of the rest of the differences are relatively minor and down to package selection and package versions.

In terms of capabilities, the only factor here is the ease of availability of a particular package, i.e. whether you can just yum/apt install a package or whether you might have to compile it from source yourself. Any Linux software can be compiled for any distro, though, so in absolute terms, there is no difference in capabilities.

6
  • I meant to say, is there anything that cannot be done in one distro but can be done in other. Is there some capability difference. Is there something one linux user can't do just because of his distro and the other user with different distro can do.
    – Pera
    May 15, 2020 at 20:30
  • It's a good practice to Edit your original question if possible with clarifications to your question, so that future Answers can address your intent directly. May 15, 2020 at 20:35
  • Ya already did the same. Thanks.
    – Pera
    May 15, 2020 at 20:39
  • Updated answer to cover the expanded question. May 16, 2020 at 8:17
  • "main differences are in the package management (e.g. rpm, deb) and the way some of the configuration is stored" - that is just wrong: It does not matter if one uses apt or pacman to install software nor does it really matter where and how config files are stored.
    – dirdi
    May 16, 2020 at 9:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .