Now I understand that my Internet speed is determined by my weakest link, which in general is based on what speed I pay for. I am looking at purchasing a new wired router and the one I want is only 100 Mbit/s, as opposed to some gigabit/s options out there so I am wondering, would the gigabit/s speed have any impact on my internal network?

See this diagram below for how I have my network configured:

Enter image description here

I have gigabit/s hubs connecting my devices back to the router. This means that they are unmanaged of course. I am looking at getting the wired router essentially to just to do the management of assigning IP addresses. Since everything else is unmanaged up to the point of the router, will the 100 Mbit/s speed impact my network?

I am trying to learn here so if the answer is yes or no, please add some explanation as to why this is true.

  • @Ramhound So when my computers are transferring data to each other, does it actually get transmitted through the router too or just the hubs?
    – Eric F
    Commented Apr 22, 2016 at 23:37
  • Disregard my comment missed your specific interest in your internal network
    – Ramhound
    Commented Apr 22, 2016 at 23:38
  • @Ramhound No problem. So the actual data never goes through the router in this setup then? Basically the only speed loss is getting IP addresses and administrative stuff like prateek mentioned?
    – Eric F
    Commented Apr 22, 2016 at 23:40
  • 5
    Back when "Fast Ethernet" was introduced, because plain hubs repeated packets to all ports, a 10 Mbit/s device connected to one port would force all devices to talk at the slower speed (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_hub#Dual-speed_hub). Your "gigabit hubs" are almost certainly switches and don't suffer from this problem; the router only sees packets destined for the internet.
    – Miles
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 3:11
  • 1
    Just a bit of food for thought: The fact that the router has a 100 Mb/s interface does not mean it can in fact route at 100 Mb/s. Consumer units might choke at speeds as low as 10 Mb/s between WAN and LAN, when they actually need to do the routing and firewalling. Also note that if you happen to set up say two subnets on the internal LAN, traffic between them will need to go through the router, impacting internal network speed.
    – AndrejaKo
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 11:19

3 Answers 3


Your internal network will not be any slower due to the fact that all devices will communicate to each other directly (by ARPing and storing MAC addresses). You will be a little slower when you interface with the router (web administration, etc.), but that should not be noticeable.

Traffic going through the router (such as going to the Internet) will be slower than your internal, but generally most consumer connections are not greater than 100 Mbit/s and as such your Internet traffic will be limited by that.

This answer assumes your gigabit hubs are in fact switches as those are more common.

  • Right, assuming my internet speed is less than 100 Mbps then I should be good with this setup then. Thanks for the help!
    – Eric F
    Commented Apr 22, 2016 at 23:42
  • You're right, I updated accordingly.
    – prateek61
    Commented Apr 22, 2016 at 23:46
  • Keep in mind that low end 100Mbps routers may only transfer data to and from the LAN at may 10-20Mbps, so unless you have DSL I would get a gigabit router. If your internet speed is more than say, 15Mbps (mine is 60-70), then I'd get a better router. Note, you can go with Cisco equipment if you want real performance and longevity. Same company that makes Linksys, but it's the enterprise side of it.
    – Daniel
    Commented Apr 28, 2016 at 17:53
  • You don't have a bad point, but I'm not sure it answers his question about the internal network. I have some bad experiences with consumer routers, however not all of them are bad.
    – prateek61
    Commented Apr 28, 2016 at 22:04

This will work fine. Your internal network will run at gigabit speed while your access to internet will be capped by the 100mbps speed.

I use this setup for my IP camera network. The cameras and the recording PC are on a gigabit network, while the internet link router is only 100mpbs. But I try to access only one camera from the internet at low res, while the recordings happen at high definition for all cameras.

When I dont access from the internet, I hardly see any packets running through my router, except when I power cycle a camera, which I guess is DHCP to get the IP assigned. only the switches blink hard otherwise.


Your LAN will probably work just fine.

Depending on the uplink speed from the modem to the ISP it is possible but rather unlikely that the use of a 100Mbit/s router will slow down your LAN. The explanation is going to get rather technical.


First of all, I will assume what you call gigabit hubs is in fact switches. Back in the days when most networks were running 100Mbit/s hubs became less common and got replaced by switches, which will give you a better network performance than switches. So it is quite unlikely that you are using hubs. I don't know if gigabit hubs are even being manufactured.


The downstream from the internet cannot slow down your LAN, if everything on your LAN except from the router is running at gigabit speeds. You can have at most 100Mbit/s coming from the router onto the LAN, and any other link those packets would travel through on the LAN will have plenty of capacity to handle the packets from the internet.

The switch receiving packets from the router will have to buffer the entire packet from the router before it can start sending it to the next device. This won't slow down your LAN. It may increase the roundtrip time to the internet, and with this happening in both directions it may cost you as much as 0.3ms on the roundtrip time to the internet. If you try to measure this slowdown, it will probably get lost in the variations in roundtrip times introduced by lots of other factors.


The point where things get interesting and potentially problematic is on the upstream. We'll consider the scenario where a computer on your LAN is sending data to a server on the internet as fast as your setup can keep up with.

Less than 100Mbit/s upstream

If the upstream speed from your modem to your ISP is less than 100Mbit/s. The roundtrip time on your internet connectivity will increase.

As TCP on the sending computer starts, it will slowly increase the sending speed until it reaches the limit. At some point it will be sending data faster than the upstream from the modem to the ISP permits. At this point the modem will start buffering packets. For instance packets may enter this buffer at 100Mbit/s from the modem but only leave towards the ISP at 50Mbit/s. As the buffer usage grows, the internet roundtrip time increases. And since these buffers in modems tend to be too large, the roundtrip time can increase significantly. But even a too large buffer will eventually fill up, and the modem will have to drop packets.

TCP on the sending computer will notice the increased roundtrip time or lost packets and adjust its sending speed accordingly. Thus it will stabilize at a sending speed lower than the 100Mbit/s which can be send from the switch to the router. Thus your LAN will not be affected, but internet connectivity will feel very slow for any interactive usage.

More than 100Mbit/s upstream

If the speed of the upstream from the modem to the ISP is increased to more than 100Mbit/s, the bottleneck is going to move. And the problem will look quite differently.

The sending computer will not see any increase in latency or packet drops until the speed goes above 100Mbit/s. Once TCP crosses that speed threshold, the switch on the left of your diagram will be receiving packets faster than 100Mbit/s. But the switch knows that it cannot send data faster than 100Mbit/s to the router, and rather than dropping packets it will signal the sender to slow down.

This means if a computer connected to the internet and to another computer on the LAN, things will behave weird. Before when the upstream to the ISP was only 50Mbit/s, it would send 50Mbit/s to the server on the internet and the other 950Mbit/s could be used to send to another computer on the LAN.

But as the upstream to the ISP is increased to more than 100Mbit/s, this computer would send 100Mbit/s to a computer on the internet and then the switch would tell the network interface to slow down. This would likely cause the computer to only send 100Mbit/s to a server on the internet and another 100Mbit/s to the other computer on the LAN. So in this scenario, increasing the internet connection speed caused the effective LAN speed to drop from 1Gbit/s to 200Mbit/s.

If the computer sending to the internet was connected to the rightmost switch, this problem would not only affect the sending computer, but also the connectivity between the two switches.

Which of the two problems you could experience depends on whether the upstream capacity from modem to ISP is more or less than 100Mbit/s. But there is a single solution, which can solve both problems.

The solution

If your router can do bandwidth management, you can configure it to limit the maximum traffic it will send to the modem. Configure this such that it will a few percent be less than the capacity of the bottleneck (which is the smaller number of the upstream from modem to ISP and the 100Mbit/s through the router).

When the router reaches this configured capacity, it must either use ECN or drop packets to signal that capacity has been reached. This will cause TCP on the sending computer to adjust to your upstream capacity before introducing any of the problems explained in this answer.

Malicious receiver

If the server receiving the traffic being send from your LAN is behaving maliciously, it can get even worse. By sending crafted acknowledgements, the receiving server could trick the sending computer on your LAN into believing there is more upstream capacity than is really the case.

Under those circumstances it is possible for a computer on your LAN to keep increasing its sending speed past the point of any bottleneck. This obviously doesn't remove the bottleneck but may create multiple bottlenecks where there should be only one.

If your internet upstream capacity was 50Mbit/s, the malicious receiver could still cause a sender on your LAN to send with the full 100Mbit/s. This will quickly fill up the buffers on the modem, and cause switches on your LAN to push back on sending speeds.

Using bandwidth management on the router would only protect the the modem buffers from filling up. It would not protect your LAN. This is because though the data send from the router to the malicious server will clearly indicate a bottleneck, the malicious server can still send acknowledgements back which give the impression that there is no bottleneck.

In this case naively implemented bandwidth management on the router could backfire. Because it eliminates the latency increase while still allowing the malicious server to hide any packet loss from the sender. That way your LAN would suffer even faster.

The good news is that whatever upload you were performing to such a malicious server will finish much quicker than you expected. And you will probably just stop using such malicious servers. And the only harm done was a temporary slowdown of your network.

  • 5
    long answer, not necessarily helpful Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 13:59
  • @UğurGümüşhan The question asked not just for a yes or no answer, but also an explanation as to why this is the case. An answer claiming there to be no way for a 100Mbit/s router to slow down a 1Gbit/s LAN would be incorrect. And an explanation as to how a 100Mbit/s router could cause a 1Gbit/s LAN to slow down really is this complicated.
    – kasperd
    Commented Apr 23, 2016 at 14:24
  • @kasperd Interesting point about limiting the bandwidth.. My router does have that capability too
    – Eric F
    Commented Apr 24, 2016 at 4:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .