1

File listing

The picture above shows a file listing for two Word documents, both created with Word for Mac 2016. Why is the .doc file so much larger?

When I create a .doc file in Word 2010 for Windows (the only other version of Word I have access to) it is only 22KB. I'm wondering if there is something wrong with the most recent update of Word for Mac 2016?

1

DOC files are (supposed to be) a "legacy" format. Sometimes DOC files were in a binary format and sometimes the DOC file was a plain-text RTF with Word extensions.

DOCX files are plain text XML and other data (e.g. images) stored in a folder tree compressed and stored in zip format. You can change the extension to ZIP and then open them. (Handy for extracting images).

Word 2010 on Windows will just change the extension of the the file to DOC if you use "save as" but it is still a zipped DOCX file.

If you save it as RTF you will probably be able to reproduce the behavior in your Windows environment.

I did a test with a single page of text from a book chosen at random from Project Gutenberg:

  • RTF = 205KB
  • DOCX = 25KB
  • RTF zipped up using 3rd party software = 31KB

So the my best guess is that the difference in file size is due to the ZIP compression.

Protected view? maybe the file is corrupted, maybe you have a VBA macro embedded and they have a 100% lockdown on macro policy, who knows. I would ask that question separately.

| improve this answer | |
  • I expect the Mac fork of Office may do some things differently, which may explain why the DOC file saves differently on the Mac. – Yorik Sep 2 '16 at 20:37
  • 2
    "Word 2010 on Windows will just change the extension of the the file to DOC if you use "save as" but it is still a zipped DOCX file." That can't possibly be true or the Internet would be full of complaints. – Daniel B Sep 2 '16 at 20:53
  • Yes, I don't quite follow how Word 2010 creates a .doc file by just changing the file extension of a .docx file. Surely then early versions of Word would be able to read .docx files if the user were to change the extension? – Jim Sep 2 '16 at 22:32
  • @DanielB: I used "save as" and picked "word 97-2003 doc file" from the type list. The result was a DOC file (the extension was added by Word, not me), and it was a zipped file with identical content as the docx. – Yorik Sep 6 '16 at 14:37
  • Yeah, sorry, but no. Just try it. It creates an OLE compound document. If it didn’t, older versions of Word or other programs expecting that wouldn’t be able to open the file. – Daniel B Sep 6 '16 at 14:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.