I have a laptop and its user is running a guest account,

There are 2 programs that start automatically when system starts (NetLimiter & TeamViewer). These programs are hidden in the tray but the guest user can close them if he wants to. Is there a way to prevent that?

I have full access to the laptop so if there is any configuration or program to install I can do it.

  • Possible duplicate of Configure a windows program to automatically relaunch if closed?
    – Ramhound
    Jan 19, 2017 at 16:12
  • 17
    Teamviewer can also be run as a service. If installed by the administrator (under the administrator account), a normal user should not be able to close it. appdataworks.com/…
    – Ajasja
    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:39
  • 1
    Since there is almost no way to prevent a user who can open the GUI of the tool to exit it via the menu, what about the option to run a regular script which checks if the program is still running and just restarts it, if the user has closed it? So the user could close it, but it would automatically restart after a few seconds ?
    – Falco
    Jan 20, 2017 at 14:41
  • Suggest dup question has an accepted answer, but it lacks substantial detail, and a good answer here could be a much better "base" solution for future duplicates. Jan 20, 2017 at 23:14
  • 1
    @RJFalconer i did Jan 24, 2017 at 18:59

4 Answers 4


To prevent closing via task manager

Get "Process explorer" and set the permissions for "Guest" on the two programs to not have "Terminate" permissions.

  1. Find process in process explorer list and right-click "Properties"
  2. Security -> Permissions
  3. Select "Guest" -> Edit.


This still does not prevent them from just closing the program normally. You'll have to hide the window and system tray icon using a 3rd party program or registry fiddling.

To throttle a network user using too much bandwidth

This appears to be your actual problem.


  • 30
    Does this only apply to a specific running instance of the process or all present and future ones? Jan 19, 2017 at 20:18
  • 25
    @MartinSmith This will only affect the currently running one.
    – Ben N
    Jan 19, 2017 at 23:50
  • 1
    Out of curiosity (as to what happens when I click the red X button) I've tried this and it doesn't seem to work for me.
    – Pavel
    Jan 20, 2017 at 18:10
  • 11
    The menu or the red X ask the program to exit voluntarily. Terminate is what happens in Task Manager.
    – Zan Lynx
    Jan 20, 2017 at 18:25
  • @ZanLynx Yes, that is, to my understanding, the par which says [...]but the guest user can close them if he wants to. Is there a way to prevent that?
    – Pavel
    Jan 23, 2017 at 11:42

The Process Explorer answer works once, but you probably want this to apply even after the computer is rebooted. To do that, you can use PowerShell:

Param (

$cscode = @"
using System;
using System.Security;
using System.Security.AccessControl;
using System.Security.Principal;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

public class ProcessSecurity : NativeObjectSecurity
    public ProcessSecurity(SafeHandle processHandle)
        : base(false, ResourceType.KernelObject, processHandle, AccessControlSections.Access)


    public void AddAccessRule(ProcessAccessRule rule)

    // this is not a full impl- it only supports writing DACL changes
    public void SaveChanges(SafeHandle processHandle)
        Persist(processHandle, AccessControlSections.Access);

    public override Type AccessRightType
        get { return typeof(ProcessAccessRights); }

    public override AccessRule AccessRuleFactory(System.Security.Principal.IdentityReference identityReference, int accessMask, bool isInherited, InheritanceFlags inheritanceFlags, PropagationFlags propagationFlags, AccessControlType type)
        return new ProcessAccessRule(identityReference, (ProcessAccessRights)accessMask, isInherited, inheritanceFlags, propagationFlags, type);

    public override Type AccessRuleType
        get { return typeof(ProcessAccessRule); }

    public override AuditRule AuditRuleFactory(System.Security.Principal.IdentityReference identityReference, int accessMask, bool isInherited, InheritanceFlags inheritanceFlags, PropagationFlags propagationFlags, AuditFlags flags)
        throw new NotImplementedException();

    public override Type AuditRuleType
        get { throw new NotImplementedException(); }

public class ProcessAccessRule : AccessRule
    public ProcessAccessRule(IdentityReference identityReference, ProcessAccessRights accessMask, bool isInherited, InheritanceFlags inheritanceFlags, PropagationFlags propagationFlags, AccessControlType type)
        : base(identityReference, (int)accessMask, isInherited, inheritanceFlags, propagationFlags, type)

    public ProcessAccessRights ProcessAccessRights { get { return (ProcessAccessRights)AccessMask; } }

public enum ProcessAccessRights
    DELETE = (0x00010000), // Required to delete the object. 
    READ_CONTROL = (0x00020000), // Required to read information in the security descriptor for the object, not including the information in the SACL. To read or write the SACL, you must request the ACCESS_SYSTEM_SECURITY access right. For more information, see SACL Access Right. 
    WRITE_DAC = (0x00040000), // Required to modify the DACL in the security descriptor for the object. 
    WRITE_OWNER = (0x00080000), // Required to change the owner in the security descriptor for the object. 

    PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS = STANDARD_RIGHTS_REQUIRED | SYNCHRONIZE | 0xFFF, //All possible access rights for a process object.
    PROCESS_CREATE_PROCESS = (0x0080), // Required to create a process. 
    PROCESS_CREATE_THREAD = (0x0002), // Required to create a thread. 
    PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE = (0x0040), // Required to duplicate a handle using DuplicateHandle. 
    PROCESS_QUERY_INFORMATION = (0x0400), // Required to retrieve certain information about a process, such as its token, exit code, and priority class (see OpenProcessToken, GetExitCodeProcess, GetPriorityClass, and IsProcessInJob). 
    PROCESS_SET_INFORMATION = (0x0200), // Required to set certain information about a process, such as its priority class (see SetPriorityClass). 
    PROCESS_SET_QUOTA = (0x0100), // Required to set memory limits using SetProcessWorkingSetSize. 
    PROCESS_SUSPEND_RESUME = (0x0800), // Required to suspend or resume a process. 
    PROCESS_TERMINATE = (0x0001), // Required to terminate a process using TerminateProcess. 
    PROCESS_VM_OPERATION = (0x0008), // Required to perform an operation on the address space of a process (see VirtualProtectEx and WriteProcessMemory). 
    PROCESS_VM_READ = (0x0010), // Required to read memory in a process using ReadProcessMemory. 
    PROCESS_VM_WRITE = (0x0020), // Required to write to memory in a process using WriteProcessMemory. 
    SYNCHRONIZE = (0x00100000), // Required to wait for the process to terminate using the wait functions. 

Add-Type -TypeDefinition $cscode

$ProcessNames | % {
    Get-Process -ProcessName $_ | % {
        $handle = $_.SafeHandle
        $acl = New-Object ProcessSecurity $handle
        $ident = New-Object System.Security.Principal.NTAccount $DenyUsername
        $ace = New-Object ProcessAccessRule ($ident, 'PROCESS_TERMINATE, PROCESS_SUSPEND_RESUME, WRITE_DAC', $false, 'None', 'None', 'Deny')

It's based on this Stack Overflow answer. Basically, you provide it with the list of processes to protect and the user to protect against, and it fiddles the processes' ACLs appropriately. Save it as a .ps1 file (somewhere the user can read but not write), then put a batch file containing something like this in the user's Startup:

powershell \path\to\script.ps1 ('snippingtool', 'mspaint') 'Guest' -executionpolicy bypass

That protects snippingtool.exe and mspaint.exe (the Snipping Tool and Paint) from being killed by Guest.

Note that this has to run after those processes start. You might have to add a sleep 10 or so after the Param block of the PowerShell script. Once it finishes, trying to kill those processes with Task Manager will cause this:

access denied

Also note that it will do nothing useful if the account you test it with is an administrator, or more precisely has SeDebugPrivilege.

Clicking the X on their windows or using the applications' own close functionality will still make the processes exit, since all processes are free to decide to stop running. You may need to hide the notification area, as described in another answer. Also, since these important processes run as the guest user, that user is the process objects' owner, and will be able to adjust the ACL back anyway, or could use PROCESS_VM_WRITE abilities to scribble over the processes' memory and crash them. Those could be solved by adding a blank ACE for OWNER RIGHTS and by changing 'PROCESS_TERMINATE, PROCESS_SUSPEND_RESUME, WRITE_DAC' to 'PROCESS_ALL_ACCESS', respectively.

Denying access to Task Manager via GPO would stop the user from using Task Manager (obviously) and is the most straightforward solution, but there's nothing stopping them from running their own program (or taskkill) that doesn't obey Group Policy. It would be best if the processes you're trying to defend ran as a different user than the one you're trying to defend against.

Of course, if your guest is willing to go to all that trouble to circumvent these various "protections," you might have more of a social problem than a technical one.

  • 6
    I think they're worried about right-clicking on the icon and choose the application's "quit" option, not terminating the process through the task manager (although that is still an issue). Jan 20, 2017 at 9:22

This really depends on how much you want to lock your guest user account down so some more information on what you want your guest account to be able to do/not do would be handy. Also is the computer domain connected?

That said my personal opinion is that any guest account domain connected or not should be heavily locked down to ensure that nothing malicious can be done using that machine, especially if it accidentally ends up in the wrong hands. I start by doing the following using group policy.

  1. Hide the notification area completely so that your user can't access any of the applications running in background. If you need them to interact with NetLimiter & TeamViewer then they can always launch them from the start menu.

    The specific GP item you need is under User Configuration > Administrative Templates > Start Menu and Taskbar > Hide the Notification area

  2. Disabled access to Task Manager which should prevent them from terminating the process.

    User Configuration > Administrative Templates > System > Remove Task Manager

  3. I believe that NetLimiter has the ability to set permissions for different users. Explore these and see if you can remove the user account ability to control the application.

That's a good start that should limit most users if you users are a little more advanced then you might have to set some more comprehensive group policies

Here is a good guide to using GP to limit polices to specific users if you need it http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/151415-group-policy-apply-specific-user-group.html

  • They will probably still want to be able to see the clock though. Jan 20, 2017 at 9:21
  • Clock is still shown when you configure hide notification area. They are separate OS components
    – MattP
    Jan 23, 2017 at 9:24

Thank you all for all the detailed answers, i ended up using some of the suggestions in the comment, here is what i did :

  • Disable the guest account completely because for some reason editing registry entry for it wont work, you'll need Admin permission, and once you get that, the modification will be applied for the Admin account as well (not sure if this is a common thing or just a bug for me)

  • Create a new user and do the following for it :

  • Disable Tray icon (in registry)

    • Had to add a volume control gadget because of this.
  • Disable Control Panel (in registry)

  • Disable Task Manager (in registry)

  • Deny certain permissions so he can't access the locations of these softwares (can't remove them or uninstall them)

Am doing this so that my brother can't use more than 20% of the internet speed (he just won't stop streaming and torrenting...) and i think these are enough to keep him locked.

Thanks again!

  • Hmmm, so basically this answer is "don't use the guest account." That's sadly anti-climatic. Jan 20, 2017 at 15:34
  • But practical: You get more control over a very limited user than you get over Guest. Jan 20, 2017 at 23:16
  • 1
    The edit to the Guest account is probably because you're changing the key in HKLM, which changes it for all users (essentially modifying the "default" setting that's used if a per-user setting is absent). Also, internet speed limits are probably best set at the router on a per-device basis if possible; you'll need to change your MAC address or gain access to the router config to get around that.
    – wizzwizz4
    Jan 21, 2017 at 15:43
  • 5
    You could just setup QoS in your router Jan 21, 2017 at 16:23
  • 6
    This is a classic example of the XY problem. You ask for a solution X when you really needed Y: "how do I prevent my brother from using more than 20% of the bandwidth"?. Which is far better solved at the router than at the computer.
    – Floris
    Jan 23, 2017 at 4:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.