2

I'm running Firefox on Arch Linux, and my support for international fonts is very limited.

This results in a lot of tofu on web pages:

Part of the Korean Wikipedia home page

Part of the Korean Wikipedia home page as an example -- although most interational fonts show up the same way.

Conversely, international fonts in the window's title bar do show up properly:

The Firefox title bar when visiting Korean Wikipedia

What I've tried so far is installing the a couple of the firefox-18n-* packages via pacman, and clearing my font cache using fc-cache -f /usr/share/fonts, but the issue's still around.

How can I get Firefox to render these international fonts properly?

  • Is the Firefox text encoding set to Unicode? Also, if you check the page source (Ctrl+U), can you see Hangul text? I presume Korean text display on other apps is OK (meaning system fonts are installed). – user3169 Feb 5 '17 at 5:19
  • @user3169 Firefox is set to Unicode, but manually setting it to Korean on ko.wikipedia.org (or Kannada, or Arabic, or any other encoding on its corresponding Wiki page) results in this. International characters show up properly in every other application on my system (gedit, vim, emacs, Thunderbird) except Chromium. – Jules Feb 5 '17 at 7:58
  • Why are you "manually setting it to Korean"? That doesn't work, even on my system. If you check the page source, you will see charset="UTF-8" so that (Unicode) is what FF must be set to. Other sites will depend on the encoding for those pages. – user3169 Feb 5 '17 at 21:24
  • @user3169 Why are you "manually setting it to Korean"? Because it takes five seconds, is reversible, and because I've never had this issue before, IMO worth a shot. – Jules Feb 6 '17 at 0:05
0

I'd actually figured this out a little while back by installing Google's Noto fonts. I'm not at my Arch box right now, but under Fedora these are available in the repos as google-noto-{sans,mono,serif}-fonts for the lot of them.

|improve this answer|||||
  • you should also install Google Roboto fonts – phuclv Apr 19 '17 at 13:18
  • @LưuVĩnhPhúc that's totally a matter of preference and not necessarily relevant, unless Roboto has solid i18n support. – Jules Apr 19 '17 at 13:47
  • yes of course. It has been the default font in Android for years, and in my experience in many cases is better than Noto – phuclv Apr 19 '17 at 13:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.