I am using an Openwrt/LEDE modem/router I am happy with (Buffalo).

However, as I am transitioning from ADSL2+ to VDSL2, the Buffalo cannot deal with the DSL signal since it's ADSL only. The ISP is giving me another modem-router (ChinaWare) that works with VDSL, but it's got crippled firmware, so it can't do everything my Buffalo's doing right now.

For this reason, I'm going to use the new modem-router (ChinaWare) in modem only mode, and my old modem-router (Buffalo) in router only mode. However, the ChinaWare admin menus have no "bridge mode" option, and the Buffalo has no WAN port. Therefore, I thought that I would simply point the Buffalo's wan (pppoe) to the ChinaWare's LAN address. This, I hope, will make the router part of the ChinaWare inactive.

Here are the questions:

Suppose my "true" router - the Buffalo - has LAN IP addr

1) Can the ChinaWare, used as modem only, be on something like, or will this wreak havoc with the rest of the LAN (computers, printers, NAS units etc.)? The alternative of setting up a dedicated VLAN and losing a LAN port on the Buffalo is much less desirable for me.

2) How do I make sure the ChinaWare never tries to hook up its WAN side (through the DSL line) to the LAN side except by opening the pppoe session? I thought about turning off NAT, firewall and all similar router options. Is there more I haven't considered? (It would be nice to have a "bridge only mode" option, but it isn't there. Talk about crippled.) If I manage to put the ChinaWare modem on the same LAN, I could even use it as another AP/ethernet switch, as long as it refers to the appropriate gateway (Buffalo on for all WAN traffic.

Thanks for any help. I'll be glad to study any relevant material you might offer!

  • 1
    That won't work. The buffalo can only route to its wan port, which is the adsl connection. – LPChip May 29 '17 at 19:40
  • I thought I'd be able at least to open a pppoe connection from the Buffalo router (it's got OpenWrt) by redirecting the WAN to a VLAN that goes into the ChinaWare modem. I was looking for a better solution to avoid making one more VLAN, and at the same time keep all 4 LAN ports as they are now. – juanriccio May 29 '17 at 21:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.