I came into possession of a house with CAT 6a F/UTP in the walls. The cables are not yet terminated, something I wish to get sorted in the near future. I've been reading up on the topic, but I'm not a networking guy, so I have some questions I can't find the answer to by just Googling.

The as-is situation: The end of the CAT 6a F/UTP cables stick out of empty UTP wall sockets unconnected in various rooms (i.e. the sockets face plates are not yet installed). The other end of the cables all terminate in one of two central places (basement and a closet upstairs).

The desired to-be situation: I would like to properly use the shielding of the cables. (It's probably overkill right now, although the cables do run together and along power cables some of which are quite beefy.)

First, some general question:

  1. If I were to not use shielded keystones/jacks anywhere on the shield cables/and not ground the cables, could that deteriorate the signal quality (further than a non shielded cable)?
  2. It's my understanding that the workstation end of the cable (wall socket) does not need to be shielded/ground, only the other end (at the switch/patch panel) of the cable. Is this correct? If yes, this means that I can use unshielded (plastic) keystones for the wall sockets? (Which would cut down on costs!)
  3. How does this work for (patch) cables between switches? One end? Both ends?

Scenario A: I don't use a patch panel, but rather I connect everything straight to two switches using shielded RJ45 jacks. The cable lengths would allow it pretty comfortably.

  1. Is this even possible in a properly shielded & ground setup? In fact...
  2. How is a switch shielded/ground anyway?

Scenario B: I do use a patch panel.

  1. In this scenario I would use a shielded patch panel which I would ground.
  2. If I were to use unshielded cables as patch cables, would that be bad, realistically? I don't think the patch cables would receive (any) interference. I think it's the walls/floors where there would be any sources of interference.

Thank you,


  • Why would you assume you won't be seeing any interference if you ran those cables along "beefy" power cables? – Seth Jul 4 '17 at 7:04

Important: There are two kinds of network cable, patch cable, which has many small strands and is flexible, and structured cabling that has a solid core and doesn't bend easily. Very likely you have the latter in your house.

Most RJ45 jacks are for the flexible patch cables, and you won't be able to use those jacks to make a good connection with structured cabling. There are special RJ45 jacks and tools for this type of cabling, too, but it's a lot easier to just connect them to patch panels as intended.

Also note that the outer shielding is mostly to keep EM interference out of the cable. This will work even if the shield is not grounded (because physics). It will work a bit better if you ground one side of it, and best if you ground both sides, if the ground connections are good, and you don't inject extra signals through this connection. To avoid this potential problem, you usually ground just one side, which is the switch side, because that one isn't expect to change or vary.

Patch cables between switches are short enough that you don't have to worry about grounded shielding.

So I'd go with Scenario B, use a shielded patch panel, use shielded patch cables to the switch, and let the switch ground the shield through the power cable (no extra grounding of the patch panel), because that's what counts to reduce EM interference.

If you ground the patch panel directly, you have the same situation as if you ground both ends: If the grounding is not good, you can make things worse instead of better.

| improve this answer | |
  • OK, thank you. I think I'm getting there... but I do wonder about the "Patch cables between switches are short enough that you don't have to worry about grounded shielding." The distance between my two switches (upstairs & basement) will be between 10-15 meters (30-50 feet), and the cable would be along power cables etc. So that would suggest to me using a shielded cable, but then if both switches are also ground, I suppose this doesn't then "inject extra signals". In your opinion, should I use shielded keystones at the wall outlet (workstation end) or could I use plastic ones? – user745051 Jul 11 '17 at 13:07
  • Ah, sorry, I pictured the situation differently (switches close together that need to be connected). If you need to connect switches over long distances, the same principles apply: use a shielded cable, ground one end by making sure ground is in contact with the switch port where it's plugged in (shielded jack, shielded patch cable), and do not ground other end in same way (unshielded jack, unshielded patch-cable). Doesn't matter which end you ground. – dirkt Jul 11 '17 at 15:18
  • I see, thanks! Just to be sure: between the switches I need to use a shielded cable with a shielded jack on one end, and an unshielded one on the other? And both switches are ground? (I'm confused because you said "unshielded patch-cable" for the other end.) – user745051 Jul 12 '17 at 19:27
  • 1
    As said in the answer, you want to connect/ground the shield of the long cable only from one side. Doesn't matter how you prevent the connection on the other side: A short non-shielded patch cable will do if your long line ends in a patch panel, a jack that doesn't pass on the shielding will do, etc. – dirkt Jul 12 '17 at 20:09
  1. Yes, in certain interference conditions.
  2. No. Grounding has to be on both ends for a proper protection. Don't use plastic.
  3. Both.

  4. Using shielded RJ45 jacks directly in the switch is fine, if the switch also supports grounding (unlike the cheap plastic 8-port ones).

  5. The switch itself is grounded via the ground power wire, so that's fine. Just make sure you pick a metallic model.

  6. Bad. Interference propagates.

Practically, the cable must have the ground wire (and shielding), which must touch the metal RJ45 jack which in turn must touch a metal switch case or a metal patch panel (which is grounded) case. Any plastic-only at any point defeats the purpose of the whole thing.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.