-1

In phones, it seems that it would only bring benefits if background applications were saved to the storage instead of being killed when memory is low. Are there any reasons why this isn't done? I'm also not talking about pagefile if any phones use that.

closed as off-topic by Ramhound, Kamil Maciorowski, n8te, bertieb, DrMoishe Pippik Apr 12 '18 at 18:25

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center." – Ramhound, Kamil Maciorowski, n8te, bertieb, DrMoishe Pippik
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • This question is not about computer hardware or software, within the scope defined in the help center. – Ramhound Apr 12 '18 at 2:02
0

It would slow down systems by paging stuff to disk and then again writing it back - all producing a very sluggish experience - waste a significant disk space to store the memory, and make restarting apps more difficult.

It also will wear out the NAND faster (typically between 5000 and 100 000). The typical speed of NAND is 15-60MB/s in Android - which is very slow compared to SSD's and even hard drives, and glacial compared with RAM.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.