3

I work in an IT department. I'm a programmer, but I do all the product setup on our website. Often I have to adjust the colours in the product preview to closely match the colours of the final real-life product. While trying to match the colour of some vinyl in real life to the preview on my screen, it occurred to me that I should probably be using a colour-accurate monitor. Then it occurred to me that maybe I shouldn't.

Since I'm not trying to get colour accuracy for the purposes of editing a photo and printing it but rather I want to match the colour of a virtual product preview with the final printed physical product and have that be as accurate as possible for as many customers as possible, do I want to be working on a colour-accurate monitor or an "average" not-completely-terrible monitor?

Most of our customers are using mobile devices, and of those customers most are on iPhones. I don't know how colour-accurate phones generally are, and I don't use an iPhone.

If you believe this question is more suitable for photography.stackexchange.com or graphicdesign.stackexchange.com, feel free to migrate it.

closed as primarily opinion-based by davidgo, bertieb, Pimp Juice IT, DrMoishe Pippik, music2myear Jun 22 '18 at 23:20

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • That's a question only you and your organization can answer. – music2myear Jun 22 '18 at 23:21
  • @music2myear No it's not. It's a statistic's based question. What is considered the correct way to handle this, that's the question. – Clonkex Jun 23 '18 at 6:58
  • No it's not. The correct answer to this question for you and your organization is based on the values and criteria that you and your organization hold. Do you want everything to be perfectly accurate and let clients deal with their own display issues? Then calibrate professionally and carefully. Do you want to try to find some happy medium? Then employ a wide range of screens and screen types. Do you prefer to try to perfectly match the client needs and perceptions? Then you'll need to do a study of their systems. These are each valid answers, and the one that is "correct" depends on you. – music2myear Jun 25 '18 at 22:43
1

I'd think of it in this way.

Almost everybody's screen is inaccurate.
Most laptop screens & mobiles are over-contrasty & punchy.
No two are the same.

However...

Everybody is used to looking at their own screen & how it represents images.
If the images are accurate in the first place, the end user sees the same discrepancy every time.

This is compounded by...

If your screen is out by some random factor, you don't know what you are sending to others.
Their screen will push your already 'uncertain' image out by that much again.

So..
The best thing you can do it make sure it's correct when it leaves your machine.
Export web images as sRGB & embed the profile.

That covers, as best as possible, how it will arrive on another screen.

Some web browsers read the profile & adjust accordingly; some ignore it & assume sRGB anyway; others just completely make it up as they go along.

TL:DR
Calibrate your workflow.

Buy a hardware colorimeter.
Don't ever attempt to do it by eye.
Basically the more you spend, the better it will be. Consider £$€ 250 to be about right.
X-Rite & Datacolor are the major players.
Make sure you get it right - colour workflow is a minefield.
Don't skimp. If you buy a cheap one, you'll end up having to buy another. I've now got 3... 2 of which are useless ;)

If you are on Windows & use more than a single monitor, set your best screen to be primary & calibrate that. Windows cannot use multiple monitor profiles in a workflow. Mac can. Nix idk about.

If you are aiming for iPhone, at least get an old one so you can see generally how the imagery is pushed. They're not all the same, but there's a family resemblance in how they modify colours. They do tend to be fairly accurate as far as 'RGB' goes, just a tad punchier than 'life'. You don't often find one with a heavy colour-cast, which is a plus.

Late thought:
If you are working from bespoke photographs, rather than image bank, the photographer needs to supply an image of his colour passport for every lighting setup.
He ought to have one of those & ought to know how to use it.
That will enable you to set a specific camera to screen workflow, via Photoshop/Lightroom etc [far too complex to describe here.]
Then your task only becomes screen to web, camera to screen is already done.
Alternatively, he needs to be responsible for sending accurate images already in sRGB.
Camera to screen is not your problem - but it may be a problem, you need to make sure it isn't.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.