I have a Qnap ts463u-rp data storage array, which contains 4x4TB HDD.

my question here is, is it safe to configure 3x4TB as RAID 5?

because from what I understood, it's not recommend to configure 12TB storage with RAID 5, because of the Unrecoverable Read Error when rebuilding the Array. is this Right?

1 Answer 1


It's not necessarily bad to configure your RAID 5 array with N TB. What you need to worry about is how much data has to be read AFTER you lose a drive. Depending on the amount and size of the disks in your RAID 5 array, is what calculates your probability of failure for rebuilding the array.

What is a URE?

A URE (Unrecoverable Read Error) is when reading the sector of a drive fails, and it cannot be fixed. A URE number simply means that "on average 1 error is detected while reading n bits". In our scenario, it's simply running a risk that it will fail to be able to read one of the distributed parities while rebuilding the array.

How to find out my probability of failure?

A typical consumer grade hard drive has a bit error rate of 10¹⁴. To calculate the probability, we would use the formula Probability = 1-((X-1)/X)^R. X is the number of outcomes, and R is the number of trials. In this case X will be our bit error rate for the drive, 10¹⁴. R will be the size of the RAID array after losing a disk. For this case that is 8 TB.

Math Time!

First, we want to convert 8 TB to bits. This equals 6.4*10¹³. Now we can finally calculate the probability of our RAID 5 failing to rebuild after losing a disk.

Probability = 1-((10¹⁴-1)/10¹⁴)^(6.4*10¹³) ... plug this bad boy into wolfram alpha and you get 0.4727... multiply that by 100 and you have a 47% chance of your RAID 5 array failing to rebuilding in a 3x4TB setup that loses a drive. If you have a 4x4TB setup and you lose one drive, you have a 61% of the disks failing to rebuild.

So should I risk it?

The overall conclusion is that if you are using consumer grade hard drives, it can be risky to use large drives with RAID 5. It's a much different story with enterprise grade drives and hardware. As an example, using a Seagate Enterprise drive with a bit error rate of 10¹⁵, recovering a 4x4TB RAID 5 array that loses a drive, has only a 9% chance of failing to rebuild. The consumer grade hard drives has a 61% chance of failure.

In response to a comment by Christoper, I found this sleek RAID rebuild failure chance calculator. It quickly and easily calculates the probability of a URE failing during a RAID 5 or RAID 6 rebuild.

RAID rebuild failure chance calculator - created and maintained by magJ

  • Neat! Do you have a source and/or similar information for RAID10? Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 15:11
  • @ChristopherHostage no I don't. But thanks to your comment I did some looking around and happen to stumble upon a nice calculator for calculating the probability of failure for RAID 5 and RAID 6.
    – DrZoo
    Commented Jun 29, 2018 at 15:29
  • @ChristopherHostage I showed this post to some co-workers today because this topic came up. I somehow stumbled upon a Reddit post that shows how to calculate the failure rate for Raid10 due to UREs
    – DrZoo
    Commented Nov 5, 2018 at 20:54
  • Excellent answer, thank you. I am, however, curious - what happens after an URE? Is the whole array lost, all the data "after" the URE or just files residing on blocks affected by the URE?
    – quantum
    Commented May 8, 2019 at 20:15
  • 2
    @quantum If a RAID5 system experiences a URE during rebuild, is all the data lost? I believe that will answer your questions.
    – DrZoo
    Commented May 8, 2019 at 21:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .