I was looking at ways to keep the CPU cool when running long jobs (40-70 mins long) that use all available cores at maximum available frequency. Also I have a lot of these jobs to run.

First I came across this script but I don't understand bash much and couldn't figure out when I kill the script, if it will restore default values in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq so I abandoned that approach.

Then I came across this question but my PC only shows performance and powersave in scaling_available_governors. It is set to powersave.

  • Does it mean the PC is automatically throttling performance to keep things cool?

Also in my /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq folder I found a file energy_performance_preference whose options are:

default, performance, balance_performance, balance_power, power

Mine is set to balance_performance.

  • What is this option and where can I find out what each one does?

Yes I know people say that modern CPUs will handle throttling and heat on their own, but nevertheless I feel about PCs the same way about cars. Sure you can get your RPM to redline, and most modern cars will prevent you from permanently damaging your engine. But once you make it a habit to redline frequently, surely the life-expectancy of the engine goes down.

  • Are their any recommended easy to use tools for Ubuntu that will let me set a max/min temperature and throttle performance like the linked script attempted to do?
  • Have you considered replacing your CPU cooler with a water block? Corsair makes the i80 and i120 and etc? Then you max them 24x7. – cybernard Jul 23 '18 at 23:10
  • Probably in the long run that will be a better option. But that means figuring out my socket, chassis, compatibility etc. So in the mean time I would like a software based solution. – ITA Jul 24 '18 at 14:45

Yes, things are shifting more and more to hardware control.

I am also looking for more answers on this, but here is what I have found so far:

https://www.mankier.com/8/x86_energy_perf_policy ($ man x86_energy_perf_policy)

The EPP settings affect "how aggressively the hardware enters and exits CPU idle states (C-states) and Processor Performance States (P-states)" for example.

It looks like "balance_performance" is the default setting for having a responsive, well-performing system but with "potentially-significant energy saving"

I have tried the "power" EPP and it results in a less responsive system due to increased latency of changing p-states and entering/leaving deeper c-states. While it may offer the potential for greater energy savings, it also seems to require a much more highly-optimized system to take advantage of the aggressive power saving as per the "race to sleep" https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/race-to-sleep e.g., so that a computer is not constantly entering and exiting c-states, as there is still significant overhead in doing so (both in terms of power and latency), at least from what I can observe.

It looks like you can change maximum and minimum frequencies as part of the EPP kit, as well as enable/disable turbo boost, which is where I would start, as it sounds like you are configuring a system to "run a marathon" vs "sprint."

While the CPU regulates performance and temperature well enough to protect the cores, it is less clear to me whether build up of heat (even within CPU maximum nominal tolerances) would negatively affect the life of other, more heat-sensitive components. So if I were you, I guess I would run some test jobs and monitor heat across memory, motherboard, disk drives, GPU (if relevant), etc. You will know pretty quickly whether or not the system is regulating within its limits. If not, you can simply decrease the maximum available frequency until you get to a thermal envelope sustainable for ALL your system components under its current cooling regiment.

Also, for a GUI-based solution for some of these parameters, check out the gnome extension: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/1082/cpufreq/ In my experience, a bit of a system hog but will let you easily set min-max frequencies and disable turbo boost.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.