I have not seen any other kind of devices which uses a Micro-USB-B-plug yet.
I'm curious, what other devices are you looking at? What kinds of connections are you seeing instead?
Furthermore i can not find many external hdds without extra power connection which have not a Micro-USB-B-plug. So why are Micro-USB-B-plugs very common for this kind of devices but not for other kind of devices?
I'm not sure I follow. If it has micro-USB-B then it doesn't have a separate power connector?
Micro-USB-B allows for a maximum of 12 watts of power to the device. If a device needs more than 12 watts then it's going to need a separate power connection or a connector that supports more power transfer, like USB-C.
Do the manufacturer have technical reasons to prefer Micro-USB-B?
Mostly it comes down to market demands and cost. Most people will want USB unless there is a specific need for something faster. Once it is decided to use USB then it comes to choosing which one of the USB connectors will work for the device at the lowest cost.
All mini-USB connectors are limited to USB 2.0 speeds, so if the device needs something faster then it's going to be the standard size USB-B, the micro sized connector, or USB-C. The standard size USB-B is quite large for something like a portable hard drive, and micro-USB-B is cheaper than USB-C.
I would not consider micro-USB-B to be all that rare or unusual. It wasn't that long ago when nearly every cell phone used micro-USB-B for power and data. Any desktop, non-portable, peripheral will likely use the larger (and likely cheaper) USB-B connector. With USB-C allowing for higher power transfer, a "flippable" connector, and more bandwidth, I can see why it's a popular alternative to micro-USB-B.
I believe what you are seeing is that USB-C is pushing micro-USB-B out of the market and portable hard drives are simply the last man standing. They rarely need more than 12 watts of power or more than 5 Gbps that micro-USB-B provides so putting in a more expensive USB-C connector is unnecessary.