0

If I copy multiple files in separate copy processes they will be performed parallel (total 72,5 MB/s):
w10 parallel copy queue

But as my target drive is a HDD it reaches more transfer speed if I pause the other copy processes (92 vs 72 MB/s):
w10 sequential copy queue

Is it possible to force this behaviour by default?

  • Why does it matter? You still have to finish copying the other files ... the total time will be the same anyway ... – DavidPostill May 26 at 11:40
  • No, @DavidPostill - it is actually significantly faster overall to do it in sequence than in parallel. Could be head movement of the disk, swap efforts, or just poor Windows programming – Aganju May 26 at 11:50
0

Do the copy from a batch file that uses dummy file as a lock. This is based on the fact that a file being written is locked, so any attempt to write it will fail.

Use this (untested) batch file as replacement for the copy command:

:loop
2>nul (
  >C:\path\to\lockfile (
    copy %*
  )
)||goto :loop

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.