1. I can't understand why Linux on flash card needs an install, does it simply copy certain file to certain location in flash card?

    I mean, plan it in a response file, then one program read the plan in response file and write certain format to flash card.

  2. Does the filesystem bind tightly to the Linux kernel? Is it possible let each kernel, user, app have its own root? Rather than mount everything under one single "root"?

migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 10 '10 at 8:26

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

  • 1
    this barely makes sense as is. – quack quixote Jun 10 '10 at 8:45
  • I believe 1 is asking why Linux on flash drives requires an install. 2 I don't get either. – Hello71 Jun 19 '10 at 2:47
  1. On PCs, the Flash card needs the MBR and bootsectors written. This is a limit of the BIOS.
  2. The is called chroot, which can be useful but also problematic, and deserves its own question.
  • does the linux on flash card have chroot yet? – Johnny Jun 10 '10 at 4:06
  • could users be chrooted? the guest don't share the some structure of folders of admin. – Johnny Jun 10 '10 at 4:14
  • @Johnny - How could you chroot a user? Did you even read the manpage for chroot? – MDMarra Jun 10 '10 at 11:30
  • sorry,i haven't. – Johnny Jun 12 '10 at 3:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.