I have a 17 inch LCD, with a maximum resolution of 1280x720. It works fine, but there are some apps that require 1024x768. I know that the maximum resolution is called like that for a reason, but is there no way of increasing the resolution, other than getting a bigger monitor?

9 Answers 9


You could use a virtual desktop; this would allow you to scroll around to support more virtual resolution. But apart from that, no. Your LCD has a maximum resolution. By definition, that means it cannot support a higher resolution.

  • 3
    I dont really understand that. Couldnt the window manager "simply" resize everything by 50% (like you would eg. in gimp)? as a virtual resolution. physical resolution (the amount of pixels displayed) would not change of course
    – phil294
    Feb 20, 2018 at 2:09

Both AMD and NVIDIA have Virtual Super Resolution (or Dynamic Super Resolution) configurations now in the latest drivers.

With AMD it should be pretty apparent in the Crimson driver.

Radeon Settings > Display > Virtual Super Resolution

enter image description here

As for NVIDIA, it's in the control panel:

enter image description here

  • windows-only. --
    – phil294
    Feb 20, 2018 at 2:27
  • Thanks, did't know this option existed. After setting the scale to 1.50x in the NVidia control panel. I went back to windows Desktop resolution and low and behold i get higher res on low res monitor Feb 5, 2021 at 18:22

Many monitors support many resolutions. If your monitor is capable of doing that resolution, then you might be able to get it to scale up a bit. But as far as exceeding a maximum resolution, the answer is usually no. The hardware generally lacks the ability to sync to a resolution that is not supported.

  • 3
    When would an LCD ever be able to handle a resolution higher than the maximum resolution it supports? Wouldn't that be logically impossible? :) Jul 29, 2009 at 16:19
  • 3
    Most either stop displaying anything or scale down. Blurry mess ftw!
    – Joey
    Jul 29, 2009 at 16:22
  • JR is right. Some monitors will actually display something when the resolution settings are off like that. The "flyback" transformer is the moderator in most cases in normal CRT style monitors. This transformer is intended to hold the sync on the signal. It usually displays what appears to be a helical pattern of lines on the screen. LCDs use a more sophisticated method and generally are smart enough to blank when a sync cannot be maintained.
    – Axxmasterr
    Jul 29, 2009 at 16:27

One of my Windows hacks is to try unchecking hide resolution that monitor can't display. I've tried to do that on my 18" Lenovo 1600x900 resolution and doing that, it showed selections for 1776x1000 and 1920x1080 resolutions. When I clicked those, however, things started looking a bit awkward.

This hack can have side effects, though. Things could start looking like a tunnel, or get distorted, compressed or stretched due to applying the wrong aspect ratio. The worst thing of this hack, I've seen, is that letters which used to be black can appear light grey, and then black screens keep flashing as there is a low refresh rate. Every day I used it, refresh rates kept dropping until it stopped at 15 Hz, the lowest refresh rate for a CRT.

A good way I found to avoid that is to use GiMeSpace. This is an example of a virtual desktop, as described in the accepted answer. GiMeSpace is a commercial product (under $20, with a free trial to see if it will work for you). It gives you a scrollable window onto a larger virtual screen. This product also has a zoom-out mode that lets you see the entire virtual screen (although interpolated to fit on the actual screen, so some detail is lost).


If you're using Windows you may want to check the text scaling !

You can configure this for each display individually. And it's worth noting that windows sometimes puts this at 150% by default.

It changes:

  • the height of the task bar
  • the sizes of the windows
  • because everything is bigger, it looks like the resolution is smaller.

So, while this isn't a way to increase the resolution. You may actually not even need to increase the resolution. It could just be the scaling that's configured incorrectly.

enter image description here


It's not the size of your monitor that determines its maximum resolution, but the technology built into it. I would recommend finding the latest drivers and utilities for your existing video card, which may have desktop stretching or other capabilities. If that doesn't help, you'll need to get a new card and/or monitor.


It sounds like you have a widescreen monitor, given that aspect ratio. 1024x768 is an old school 4:3 resolution (give or take).

Desktop scaling is annoying and will never look quite right.

The BEST thing to do is to buy a new LCD (most new LCDs are widescreen), 19" and above. Almost all should have a resolution larger than 1024x768.

The most cost effective solution (especially if your PC supports multiple monitors) is to buy a used 17" or 15" fullscreen 4:3 ratio LCD - those will do the resolution you need, and it would be neat to have a second monitor on your system. A used 15" LCD is dirt cheap nowadays.


If you are looking for an possibility to show simply more Programs virtual desktop_s_ are the solution.

For Windows XP there is a PowerToy allowing different Desktops which could be populated with different Program Windows. I would be surprised if there is no solution for other windows versions. In Linux this is pretty standard. You could switch between the Desktops by an hotkey which is pretty convenient. I would say this is the best solution i know about.

  • This is a good idea, generally, for lack of screen space, but this question is specifically about individual apps that require more resolution. The multiple desktops wouldn't help for that.
    – fixer1234
    Mar 20, 2016 at 16:52

I would suggest you look for an 'upgrade' to that particular program, or an alternate program that does the same thing at the resolution of any monitor. Virtual desktop solutions eat up your resources and slow down your machine, and there's also a possibility of incompatibility with other software. The best solution would be to get a second monitor -- an old 4:3 at that lower res should be about $10. If you don't have a dual-monitor capable video card, then you're using something pretty antiquated and you should invest in a newer video card. That will improve your system's overall performance graphics-wise, which essentially means system-wise because Windows is a GUI environment and there's a lot of focus by the system on the graphics involved in displaying Windows, moving them around, etc. Therefore, even if you decide to stay with the multi-res, virtual desktop solution, you'll have improved performance. Your games will perform better also -- always a plus!

  • 1
    Well, it's been quite some time now (more than two years, in fact). I have a bigger monitor now. But thanks for the input anyway.
    – Javier
    Oct 12, 2011 at 23:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.