I keep hearing that this is a huge no-no. Why is this? I run Ubuntu mostly so it doesn't affect me, but I was just wondering.

  • 3
    I can't say I'm educated in this area, but I believe it is because SSDs are damaged slightly every time they perform a write, and defragmenting wears out the SSD faster. Also, since SSDs have no moving parts, defragmenting SSDs gives a smaller performance gain than defragmenting HDDs.
    – Blixt
    Commented Jul 15, 2009 at 13:33
  • 1
    Note to readers landing on this page: thinking on this subject has changed in the 7 1/2 years since this question was asked. Please be sure to see the recent answers here and the answers on the current question this is marked as a duplicate of.
    – fixer1234
    Commented Dec 1, 2016 at 16:20

8 Answers 8


Solid state drives are based on flash memory, which age very differently than standard spinning platter-based hard drives. Each sector has a limited number of write cycles, so the drives include wear-leveling features that allows the drive to last longer by essentially fragmenting the drive on purpose.

The read times are not greatly improved by defragmenting as they are in standard drives, so there is no real gain in defragmentation, but by doing so, you are increasing the number of writes to the drive, thereby decreasing the drive life.


Defragmenting puts your sectors near each other which is helpful for a disk that spins around. However, this is useless on an SSD which has constant access time for any sector. Defragmenting just causes extra writes on a disk (SSDs have a limited number of writes due to their design)


Note that there shouldn't be any technical reason for not "being able to defragment a solid state drive", in the sense that you could start a defragmenter program and run it against the drive.

But doing so doesn't have the effect it does on non-solid state drives, as moving the clusters together won't actually speed up the drive.

On the other hand, what you will do is perform lots of unnecessary writes on the drive, and this will shorten, albeit slightly, the life-span of the drive.

Additionally, many solid-state drives does optimizations to lessen this problem by reducing repeated writes to the same area, and this is transparent to the outside system, in which case the clusters might not be moved together at all but instead spread out over the drive. This technique is typically "wear leveling".

If a defragmenter program refuses to defragment a solid state drive (or even just list it as a drive you can select), I'd wager that it's basically a software refusal to do so, just to avoid the problems outlined above.

Note that I don't know enough about the underlying protocols used to defragment a drive, so there might very well be a hard block from a solid state drive to accept defragment commands, if there are such things. The reasons for this, however, are the ones described here.

  • 1
    SSD = solid state drive. There is no disk. You keep on using "disk" instead of "drive".
    – sawdust
    Commented Aug 1, 2015 at 1:16

Defragging will lower the live expectancy of your drive by performing unnecessary passes over a drive with a limited life-span.


It depends on what is on the drive. You will not get any performance increase by defragging an SSD, but it will have an impact on data-recovery.

On the one hand, flash-memory has a limited number of write cycles, so doing a lot of writing will eventually wear it out. Flash drives, memory cards, and SSDs use tricks like wear-leveling and TRIM to extend the life of the media, but defragmentation tends to cause a large number of writes, which will cause it wear out all the faster.

On the other hand, fragmented files are infinitely harder to recover when accidentally deleted, hit by a virus, etc. so keeping your files in a contiguous state (e.g., by defragmenting) will greatly increase the chances of recovery.

Therefore, like I said at the start, it depends on what is stored on the drive, how important the files are, how likely you are to need to perform data-recovery, and how frequently the files are changed (frequent deletions and copies will lead to fragmentation faster as well as eat up more write cycles).


Actually, you can. Defragmentation is a filesystem-level thing, it doesn't matter what is on the lower, block level.

But in the case of the SSD there is no disk head whose movements should be minimized. Thus, it won't be faster, not even a little bit.

Some OSes and tools forbid this only, because the decisions of their developer companies like to mix the meaning of "you don't need" and "you can't". But these are different things.

Probably there are multiple hacks which could avoid this ban (regedit, or exporting the drive as iscsi and re-importing to the same machine, etc). In this case, you will find a very fragmented drive, whose defrag will be very long. It is because the OS doesn't care about fragmentation on their case. And, as other answers also mention, this defrag won't make your system faster, but it will reduce its life.

  • True. You can defrag the filesystem on an SSD. And as far as the OS is concerned you now have nice clean sequential data. (All of which is very much not true on the actual drive, which does its internal mapping).
    – Hennes
    Commented Oct 1, 2015 at 13:22

It is not bad all the time. Manually running a full defragmentation is something you should not do, but if you have volume snapshots are enabled, windows 8/10 will defrag the SSD once per month:

This is by design and necessary due to slow volsnap copy on write performance on fragmented SSD volumes. It’s also somewhat of a misconception that fragmentation is not a problem on SSDs. If an SSD gets too fragmented you can hit maximum file fragmentation (when the metadata can’t represent any more file fragments) which will result in errors when you try to write/extend a file. Furthermore, more file fragments means more metadata to process while reading/writing a file, which can lead to slower performance.


No, Windows is not foolishly or blindly running a defrag on your SSD every night, and no, Windows defrag isn't shortening the life of your SSD unnecessarily. Modern SSDs don't work the same way that we are used to with traditional hard drives.

Yes, your SSD's file system sometimes needs a kind of defragmentation and that's handled by Windows, monthly by default, when appropriate. The intent is to maximize performance and a long life. If you disable defragmentation completely, you are taking a risk that your filesystem metadata could reach maximum fragmentation and get you potentially in trouble.


According to Condusiv Technologies:

SSDs start out really fast and then quickly start to lose their speed and over time become subject to corruption. SSDs require that old data be erased before new data is written over it, rather than just writing over the old information like with hard drives. This doubles the wear and tear and can cause major issues.

The principle issue is write speed degradation due to free space fragmentation. Small free spaces scattered across the SSD cause the file system to write a file in fragmented pieces to those small available free spaces. By doing so, it degrades write performance by as much as 80% to the solid state drive.

SSDs can only write so many times to the drive as they have a finite number of writes that they can perform. Due to the doubling effect of needing to read and erase before it can write again, SSDs undergo twice as much use.

As the SSD approaches its limit, more fragmentation and write errors occur, causing SSD slows. Write performance decreases proportionately as free space fragmentation increases. All SSDs will suffer from this problem at one point or another unless HyperFast is used to optimize the solid state drive.

They therefore recommend using their product called Diskeeper.Accoding to the company:

Diskeeper with HyperFast keeps your system running as fast as when you purchased it, by optimizing the free space on your SSD. The HyperFast feature, included with Diskeeper 12 specifically solves these issues by intelligently eliminating performance–degrading free space fragmentation which can promote random rather than the more efficient sequential writes to occur. This technology along with the IntelliWrite Technology promotes the more efficient and beneficial sequential writes to occur rather than random writes.

More info about their product is available:


Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .