I looked up both on desktech.com:
The price may change over time, but they currently appear to be basically identical.
The only metric that could be better is the power consumption, but it's a tiny amount in absolute terms (7.5W vs "<10").
- Cache MB: 128 vs 256
- MTBF: 800K vs 2M
- TB/Year: 180 vs 550
- Nonrecoverable Read Errors per Bits Read: 1 per 10e14 vs 1 sector per 10E15
What's the advantage of the "Archive" drive if it has a worse Nonrecoverable Read Errors per Bits Read and a worse MTBF rating?