1

I'm trying to install libapache2-mod-passenger (from backports) to a Debian Lenny system containing apache2-mpm-itk. What happens is this:

# aptitude install libapache2-mod-passenger
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information      
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descriptions... Done  
The following packages are BROKEN:
  libapache2-mod-php5 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apache2-mpm-worker{a} javascript-common{a} libapache2-mod-passenger 
  libjs-prototype{a} librack-ruby{a} librack-ruby1.8{a} wwwconfig-common{a} 
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  apache2-mpm-itk{a} 
0 packages upgraded, 7 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 792kB of archives. After unpacking 3191kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  libapache2-mod-php5: Depends: apache2-mpm-prefork (> 2.0.52) but it is not installable or
                                apache2-mpm-itk but it is not installable
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Remove the following packages:
libapache2-mod-php5

Score is 119

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]

As far as I understand, this is because mod_passenger requires Apache version >=2.2.9-9, but the apache2-mpm-itk of Lenny is only version 2.2.6-02. This is at least a reported bug, and even claims to be fixed, but apparently has been reported again. Is there any trick to get mod_passenger installed while keeping the mpm-itk flavor of Apache? Apparently Passenger would work with Apache 2.2.6-02, the problem is just that the package dependency is set to wrong version.

|improve this question
2

If you just want to change the package dependencies apt-get source package-name
cd debian
nano control and change version requirements
cd ..
apt-get build-dep package-name
apt-get install build-essential devscripts fakeroot
debuild

for more on rolling your own debs here's a tutorial: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=51003

disregard the setting up directories as that's done by apt-get source

|improve this answer
  • for all ruby/rails stuff i use lucid LTS and gem for the installs – RobotHumans Nov 13 '10 at 17:12
  • Thanks; I have no previous experience of de(re?)building Debian packages. Is it really as simple as those couple of commands? Does it make a .deb file, which I then install with dpkg? – Joonas Pulakka Nov 13 '10 at 17:15
  • it can be that simple...sometimes it isn't. added a couple lines since your box hasn't been used for this before...and yes it produces debs...you are re-building a package but you are deb-building hence debuild. – RobotHumans Nov 13 '10 at 17:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.