I’m looking for a tool, command line or GUI, for Linux that generates memorable passwords.

An equivalent of what I am looking for would be passwords that the Mac OS X keychain can generate, something like apples12$/fourteen. Something strong, but easily memorized by a user.


I've since moved on to XCKD style passphrases for most of my passwords. Here is a 1 liner from commandlinefu to generate a passphrase:

shuf -n4 /usr/share/dict/words | tr -d '\n'
| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    actually, there is an issue with this one-liner: it may use words like "the", "them", "their" and "moat", "iris", "he". Do you see the problem? There's an overlap between prefixes and suffixes, which reduces the actual entropy of the generated password and can lead to pretty weak passwords if the strings are not long enough (especially with 4 words). This is why word-based password generators use crafted word lists. Granted, passwords generated with the above are pretty good: 14 chars minimum in my tests, with a median size of 34. But their entropy is not reliable. – anarcat Aug 31 '17 at 19:13
  • What is the the issue with having overlapping prefixes / suffixes? I can understand your point about length, but you'll need to explain the other point. – James McMahon Sep 12 '17 at 2:20
  • let's simplify to the extreme. you have a dictionnary made out of three words: the, me and theme. normally, you would expect you'd have the entropy equally from those three words, but in this case, you can't count theme because it is a combination of the other two words. in effect, theme actually adds zero entropy to the password. – anarcat Sep 12 '17 at 14:07
  • But isn't "the me" distinct from "theme"? I get that possible letters add entropy but this approach is more about the size of passwords. I don't get how "the me theme" would be easier to guess then a sequence with no overlapping characters like "do ray music" – James McMahon Sep 13 '17 at 0:15
  • 1
    @wbg my answer is here superuser.com/a/1246245/177019 – anarcat Nov 19 '19 at 14:55

2020: I posted this answer in 2011. In the years that have passed, the face of cyber security and the demands to it have changed rapidly and enormously. As has been pointed out by anarcat, pwgen may not (or no longer) be suitable for securing high-security systems. He sets out to describe the technical details on how pwgen can, in some circumstances, use insecure methods of password derivation from available entropy in his article. Although I no longer believe in generating passwords to then try and remember them myself, I do not have the technical aptitude to validate, let alone vouch for the contents of the article as quoted so please read it and draw your own conclusions. Having said that, I am convinced that pwgen will suffice for low-security systems where attack is very unlikely.

You might want to check out the pwgen application. I know it to be available in the Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian and Suse repositories.

From the man page:

The pwgen program generates passwords which are designed to be easily memorized by humans, while being as secure as possible. Human-memorable passwords are never going to be as secure as completely completely random passwords. In particular, passwords generated by pwgen without the -s option should not be used in places where the password could be attacked via an off-line brute-force attack. On the other hand, completely randomly generated passwords have a tendency to be written down, and are subject to being compromised in that fashion.

The pwgen program is designed to be used both interactively, and in shell scripts. Hence, its default behavior differs depending on whether the standard output is a tty device or a pipe to another program. Used interactively, pwgen will display a screenful of passwords, allowing the user to pick a single password, and then quickly erase the screen. This prevents someone from being able to "shoulder surf" the user's chosen password.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    Passwords like 'Zei7jool' or 'Oowee6ei' don't seem very memorable to me. Perhaps I am missing a flag? – James McMahon Jan 24 '11 at 18:44
  • 3
    @James They are generated according to an algorithm that puts letters in a non-sense, yet because they are logical in human linguistics, rememberable order. You'll probably have to make a similar effort to remember the apples12$/fourteen password. Just give it a try. – Pylsa Jan 24 '11 at 18:47
  • 1
    It spews out a giant list of passwords, just choose the most memorable -- there are some gems in there ;-) – virtualeyes Mar 27 '13 at 12:07
  • 4
    pwgen passwords have serious security issues by default, and are not very memorable. use diceware or xkcdpass instead. – anarcat Jan 30 '17 at 20:01
  • 1
    @anarcat thanks! I agree pwgen may not be the best option (anymore) but I will leave my answer with the disclaimer I added to address your concerns in place for historical purposes. – Pylsa Jan 4 at 20:05

I would recommend people stop using pwgen - its main interested was generating "human-rememberable passwords", but it showed multiple vulnerabilities in doing exactly that. And using it to generate completely random strings isn't that useful either.

I wrote a detailed article on that very topic, but basically, the gist of it is to use the diceware program (or, if you like dice, the actual diceware system) or xkcdpass. To generate strong memorable passwords, I generally use diceware with the following configuration file:

caps = off
delimiter = "-"
wordlist = en_eff


$ diceware
$ diceware
$ diceware
$ diceware

I turn off caps and spaces because they generate distinct audible noises that could be leveraged by an attacker. The - delimiter is a lesser evil: it would be better to not use any separator and the en_eff wordlist is especially crafted for that purpose. But I find it easier to communicate and share passwords when they have some separator.

To generate a completely random password, I use the following shell function:

# secure password generator or, as dkg puts it:
# high-entropy compact printable/transferable string generator
# a password generator would be pwqgen or diceware
pwg() {
    ENTROPY=${1:-20} # in bytes
    # strip possible newlines if output is wrapped and trailing = signs as they add nothing to the password's entropy
    head -c $ENTROPY /dev/random | base64 | tr -d '\n='

I mention this because I believe it is important to memorize less passwords and instead rely on a password manager to store large strings that are hard to guess. More details about the rationale behind those choices is explained in the aforementioned article and my password managers review.

| improve this answer | |

Try 'gpw'. It produces passwords such as these: ubsonsin morimplo demenump esselymn kidentst anenterg essonsuf iesssssi bestruss tnestese

Description: Trigraph Password Generator This package generates pronounceable passwords. It uses the statistics of three-letter combinations (trigraphs) taken from whatever dictionaries you feed it. Thus pronounceability may differ from language to language. Based on the ideas in Morrie Gasser's password generator for Multics, and Dan Edwards's generator for CTSS. FIPS Standard 181 describes a similar
digraph-based generator, derived from Gasser's.

| improve this answer | |

A good option that has popped up since I asked this is Redacted's XKCD-password-generator.

It's a nice Python script to generate XKCD style passwords that has some advance options like acrostic support.

| improve this answer | |

sf-pwgen is a command line tool which generates passwords using the SecurityFoundation framework in OS X.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.