5

I got a new "Gigabyte Z68X-UD4-B3" motherboard which supports SSD caching. I also have an old OCZ Vertex 60GB SSD and a WD Caviar Black(1T) HDD.

I am thinking of installing the OS to the HDD and using the SSD for caching. How would the performance in this setup compare with having the OS on the SSD?

  • Have you searched before? Performance questions regarding SSDs/HDDs and operating systems have been asked and answered several times. – slhck Jul 19 '11 at 22:49
  • 1
    I am not just comparing SSD and HDD. The motherboard support SSD caching, hence I want to know how the performance is compare to a dedicated SSD. Thanks. – garconcn Jul 19 '11 at 23:29
  • 1
    Have you seen Anand's review of the Z68 chipset? It covers this, and the result is that you're better off dedicating an SSD to OS/Apps duty if it's large enough, but SRT is better than nothing. – afrazier Jul 19 '11 at 23:33
  • Possible duplicate of Intel Smart Response vs SSD as primary drive – TManhente May 2 '16 at 13:46
5

The performance of Intel's Smart Response Technology (SRT) on Z68 Sandy Bridge motherboards has been examined by AnandTech:

it's not going to make your high end SSD obsolete. You'll still get better overall performance by grabbing a large (80-160GB+) SSD, putting your OS + applications on it, and manually moving all of your large media files to a separate hard drive. What SRT does offer however is a stepping stone to a full blown SSD + HDD setup and a solution that doesn't require end user management.

In other words, by using SSD caching rather than separating the SSD and HDD, you trade a bit of performance consistency for convenience and simplicity for the user.

  • Thanks. I am going to have a look at the AnandTech review. – garconcn Jul 19 '11 at 23:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.