I'm considering either going 64-bit Windows (Dell i7 laptop) or getting an SSD. I can only get one. Things I run a lot:

  • SSMS
  • Visual Studio
  • Office 2010

Lots of programs simultaneously.

What will have the biggest impact, the SSD or the 64-bittedness and RAM?

  • 2
    This does not look like a programming question at all.
    – Mat
    Jul 26, 2011 at 18:08
  • Probably the RAM.
    – KCotreau
    Jul 26, 2011 at 18:13
  • Do you already have Windows 7 32-bits? The 32- and 64-bit versions of windows use the same license keys, so you don't need to pay for a new key, only for the media (no more than $20 and that includes shipping) or just borrow it from a friend. Jul 26, 2011 at 18:24
  • How much memmory do you have now..? Jul 26, 2011 at 22:56

4 Answers 4


RAM. Lots of RAM.

enter image description here

It's fun to take an SSD and say "Look, I can boot in 7 seconds" but the RAM will give you more bang for your buck.

  • 1
    I disagree ;-) Even on my 8GB box the SSD makes programs open much snappier. Bang-for-buck, perhaps. However, I can not recommend against an SSD, money aside.
    – pst
    Jul 26, 2011 at 18:23
  • @pst: I wasn't saying an SSD is bad, but since the OP stated the question as either/or, I'd take the RAM over the SSD as the better option for improving over all system performance. Jul 26, 2011 at 18:24
  • RAM. Cause you'll save more money getting an aftermarket SSD that is faster.
    – surfasb
    Jul 26, 2011 at 21:01
  • 2
    With more RAM you will have more cache space which means unparalleled performance if you're handling a relatively fixed set of files. Your system may boot slower compared to one with SSD, but when things are running and you have enough memory to avoid paging, you can barely feel the difference. Learn to use sleep mode and never close applications. Mind you that if you have small memory (say 2GB) and swaps a lot to your SSD, it will probably die within one year; however, if you already have 4GB or more memory, installing more will not make much difference even if you move to 64-bit.
    – billc.cn
    Jul 26, 2011 at 22:03

I can guarantee you that the RAM will be both cheaper, and last longer then the SSD. That, and it's not a big deal to purchase an SSD in the future should you actually need it.

Since this came from Stack Overflow, I'll assume that the data you work with is very important, and you can't sustain a big data loss. If you go the SSD route, be aware that you can easily burn it out in less then a year, and possibly lose all of your data with it.

Obviously, backing up your data every day will mitigate this risk, but what you need to ask yourself is, do you really need the speedup? Could you not just get a SSD in the future should you decide that your HDD is too slow for your purposes? And for that matter, will you actually need or benefit from the extra RAM you want to get?

I'm sure you know by now the benefits and drawbacks to more RAM or a SSD - the decision is for you to make, not this community. The decision depends on your purposes. That being said, it's not a one-way road if you choose one over the other. Computer parts are cheap, and getting cheaper every day. Keep in mind that you can always upgrade in the future.

Finally, since you're even asking this question, I'll give you my honest recommendation: don't upgrade either. If you want more RAM in the future, or you want a faster storage device in the future, buy it when you need it, not before. Not only will it be cheaper (especially not purchasing it from a computer retailer), but you might not even find you need either for a little while.


It depends on how much RAM you currently have and how much you'd like to spend ;-)

I can not state how much faster an SSD is. It is purely amazing. An good SSD is so fast at random-access that under moderate swap, it will make the swap operation practically unnoticeable.

On my 3GB laptop where swap would kill the system with StarCraft II + Visual Studio open (over 80 pages/sec while switching), putting in the SSD made me able to run both and switch back and forth freely and I didn't notice any swap. Of course, this depends on many factors including usage patterns.

Since an SSD is relatively expensive ($200+ USD for 100-120GB with a good controller) and 4GB-8GB of memory is relatively cheap ($30-$70?) there is likely no reason to only get the SSD. However, if it can be afforded, once using an SSD -- there is no going back. It is a revolution. (There are, however, data concerns -- SSDs like to fail fast, unlike HDDs which would often give warnings like the "tick of death". Keep backups.)

Best wishes.


These two are not mutually exclusive. You can get the SSD AND the Windows 64bit - Windows versions have the same price. And installing 64bit would allow you to add more memory later (just make sure your motherboard supports it).

As a general rule, an SSD will make things run faster. But if your memory is full, you'll start paging a lot.

Price-wise, upgrading a laptop to 8GB just dropped to $50-70, I'd get both. A good SSD will set you back more.

  • A good SSD will make light-moderate load paging (at least in my experience) virtually not noticeable. It is much slower than RAM, but it's about user experience... big difference between server with a constant load or a video editor and my usage patterns though.
    – pst
    Jul 26, 2011 at 18:24

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.