Is there any way to list just the folders in a directory using bash commands? ( as the ls command lists all the files and folders )

8 Answers 8


You can use:

ls -d -- */

Since all directories end in /, this lists only the directories in the current path. The -d option ensures that only the directory names are printed, not their contents.

  • 2
    ls -- */ lists all directories with their contents below
    – Vins
    Jan 21, 2013 at 11:32
  • 4
    @8088 What is the difference between ls -d -- */ and ls -d */? Mar 24, 2014 at 17:25
  • 7
    @Louis, -- is conventionally used to mark the end of options, so that if a file is named -l ls won't interpret it as the long listing format option. Apr 22, 2014 at 0:20

Stephen Martin's response gave a warning, and listed the current folder as well, so I'd suggest

find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d

(This is on Linux; I could not find -maxdepth and -mindepth in the POSIX man page for find)

  • 2
    Older question I know. While I would too initially turn to find for this task, I like the ls -d -- */ option, as find will find hidden directorties too. Which can sometimes be useful, but also sometimes cause trouble. I hope this comment might help others. +1
    – matchew
    Dec 21, 2012 at 16:16
find . -maxdepth 1 -type d

Will list just folders. And as Teddy pointed out you'll need -maxdepth to stop it recusrsing into sub dirs

  • 5
    You probably want -maxdepth 1 too.
    – Teddy
    Sep 14, 2011 at 8:40

Daniel’s answer is correct. Here are some useful additions, though.

To avoid listing hidden folders (like .git), try this:

find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d  \( ! -iname ".*" \)

And to replace the dreaded dot slash at the beginning of find output in some environments, use this:

find . -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d  \( ! -iname ".*" \) | sed 's|^\./||g'

You're "not supposed to" parse the output of ls, or so is said. The reasoning behind is that the output is intended to be human-readable and that can make it unnecessarily complicated to parse, if I recall.

if you don't want ls or find, you may want to try filtering "*" with "[ -d ]".

I did just that, for some reason ls and find weren't working (file names with spaces and brackets I guess, or somthing else I was overlooking), then I did something along the lines of

for f in * ; do [ -d "$f" ] && echo $f is indeed a folder ; done

Just to emphasize a thing that confused me out here, in respect to glob patterns selection; say you have this:

$ cd /tmp
$ mkdir testglob
$ for ix in {00,01,02,03} ; do mkdir testglob/mydir_${ix} ; done
$ for ix in {00,01,02,03} ; do touch testglob/myfile_${ix} ; done
$ for ix in {00,01,02,03} ; do touch testglob/mydir_${ix}.txt ; done
$ for ix in {00,01,02,03} ; do mkdir testglob/otherdir_${ix} ; done
$ tree testglob/
├── mydir_00
├── mydir_00.txt
├── mydir_01
├── mydir_01.txt
├── mydir_02
├── mydir_02.txt
├── mydir_03
├── mydir_03.txt
├── myfile_00
├── myfile_01
├── myfile_02
├── myfile_03
├── otherdir_00
├── otherdir_01
├── otherdir_02
└── otherdir_03

8 directories, 8 files

So, say here you want to select only mydir* directories. Note that if you leave out the terminating slash, ls -d will list files as well:

$ ls -d testglob/mydir*   # also `ls -d -- testglob/mydir*`
testglob/mydir_00      testglob/mydir_01      testglob/mydir_02      testglob/mydir_03
testglob/mydir_00.txt  testglob/mydir_01.txt  testglob/mydir_02.txt  testglob/mydir_03.txt

... however, with a terminating slash, then only directories are listed:

$ ls -d testglob/mydir*/   # also `ls -d -- testglob/mydir*/`
testglob/mydir_00/  testglob/mydir_01/  testglob/mydir_02/  testglob/mydir_03/

printf "%s\n" */ will list all directories in the $PWD.

echo */ will also work, but in a long one-line, more difficult when names have spaces.


You can also use:



git ls-tree -d -r --name-only @

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.