Is it possible to store arbitrary data such as documents or a program in the form of an image file, such as a PNG image? My concern is that someone could encode data for use by malware into an image and upload it to a site like Flickr.

  • 3
    Check out the MICE exploit that gave Microsoft a black-eye a couple of years ago.
    – Synetech
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 2:01
  • 1
    Yes, that was among the links in the MICE page. If you’re arbitrarily adding links from that page, then you may as well add this, this, this, this, this, this, and most of all this.
    – Synetech
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 3:15
  • @Synetech: Sorry; the link in the (now deleted) comment was from a Google search, not from the Wikipedia article.
    – bwDraco
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 3:17
  • Oh okay; no worries. The Wikipedia article has some great tech specs (I linked most of the best ones from Microsoft, Sysinternals, and GRC). That thing really caused more hype than actual damage from what I recall. The last link in my comment was the third-party patch that someone took it upon themselves to make until Microsoft released and official Windows Update to patch it. :-P
    – Synetech
    Commented Jul 6, 2012 at 3:21

3 Answers 3


For most file formats, yes. For example, PNG files are composed of typed chunks, so you could add a chunk named aAAA or lOLZ with arbitrary data. JPEG has "application-specific" segments APPn; the Exif tags in JPEGs are actually a complete TIFF structure inside such a tag. Other formats such as GIF are not extensible, but they often do have a field for textual comments; this has already been abused.

However, there are ways to protect against this – for example, such websites as Imgur automatically process all uploads with pngcrush or similar tools, which drop anything that's not absolutely required.

But in the end, data exchange cannot be prevented. Aside from the aforementioned image steganography, you have Twitter and its clones, dozens of pastebins (in which incomprehensible posts are considered fairly normal), comment forms of old blog posts (I'm still trying to remember the book this was suggested in), ... more realistically, most malware will simply contact their "own" servers.


There is no such thing as malicious data. Data doesn't become malicious until it's executed, at which point it's no longer data. The problem with this sort of thing would not be the image, it'd be the software (Windows, Photoshop, whatever) that contains a bug that causes the data to be executed. This is obviously an important concern of major software vendors, and you can be fairly sure they would fix these bugs very soon after they've been discovered.

That said, as is stated in the other answers, it is possible to add data that is not part of the image itself to the file. However, this is often useful or even standard practice. I think it's much more important to be careful with executables than with random images you find on the internet. The risk here is not that big.

  • 1
    "data can't be malicious" what about malware using steganography to send information such as your credit card number via innocent looking channels?
    – rr-
    Commented Sep 17, 2015 at 8:51

Image files, including PNG, have a specific format. The header portion of the file describes the image, and any data following would be interpreted as image data (based on the headers).

However, you can append arbitrary data to the end of a PNG, past the image data, which can then be read later. This would be fairly easy to detect - there shouldn't be any data past the end of the image data.

Alternatively, you can encode arbitrary data into the image itself, using steganography. This subtly alters the image itself in a way that is largely indetectable unless you know exactly what to look for (prior knowledge of the encoding method is often required).

  • I know that Adobe Fireworks actually stores extra data in png files (that's not part of the image). Commented Nov 16, 2011 at 0:14
  • Steganography: stegosploit.info obviously Commented Jun 3, 2018 at 15:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .