If you are tethering to the internet through your mobile and your notebook is low on power you may want that connection to use the least possible power for your notebook. A USB connection will charge your phone and drain the notebook battery. Wifi and Bluetooth also require some power.

How does energy usage for a notebook compare for the following?:

  • usb connection to a phone
  • wifi connection to a phone
  • bluetooth connection to a phone
Assume light browsing, and a low usage of bandwidth.

2 Answers 2


Use Bluetooth then, if your phone supports BT internet sharing.

USB is not an option, since it'll give away up to 2.5W to your phone, and SoftAP eats far more in terms of power consumption if you compare it with Bluetooth.

  • Are you sure about that? Wi-Fi signals are an order of magnitude more powerful than Bluetooth (the same data rate that's transmitted at 80mW on WiFi is only transmitted at 2mW on Bluetooth). The reasons are obvious as Bluetooth is designed to be low-interference and short range. Apr 22, 2012 at 4:17
  • @Lèsemajesté, sure about what? You probably have misread my answer, as I'm stating basically the same. In fact, SoftAP (WiFi tethering) might consume up to 3x more than in station mode. Apr 22, 2012 at 13:17
  • I guess I did. I wrote that comment before Spiff's edit, when your answer read "SoftAP eats far less in terms of power consumption if you compare it with Bluetooth". Not sure how I glanced over your first paragraph though... Apr 22, 2012 at 13:30
  • Ough.. I see now. Yes, this is what I actually meant :) Apr 22, 2012 at 13:32

USB would be "cheapest", if WIFI and Bluetooth radios are turned off, and the phone is already charged and the display stays off.

However, plugging in an iPhone in particular causes the display to go on bright and stay on, and that creates a significant current draw. Other phones may behave differently. [NB: Actually, I discovered that this was because the phone was simply set to not turn off the display.]

Bluetooth would be the second choice, especially if you can turn on Bluetooth without WIFI (which is a bit of a trick, since they share much of the same hardware).

If you need WIFI on for other reasons then it probably doesn't matter much between WIFI and Bluetooth.

Added: As I stated above, I discovered that the iPhone display problem was simply a settings problem. Fixed that and the display turns off after the timeout. So the USB tether should always be the lowest current option, if you can turn off the radios.

  • Does the display go to bright even when connected to an unpowered USB port? Apr 22, 2012 at 3:57
  • Dunno. But it may be that the behavior I've observed is due to a setting in the phone that can be changed. Apr 22, 2012 at 11:56
  • @DanH: 1. Sure, it depends on hardware, but I'm not aware of any phone that will not consume power from USB even if the battery is charged. 2. Bluetooth and WiFi often shares the same clocks, but are totally isolated on a silicon. Try to find a datasheet for one of the popular mobile combos, and you will find out that both BT and WLAN have separate reset lines, and interfaces as well - BT works via UART, while WLAN in most cases works on SDIO. So, I disagree with you. Apr 22, 2012 at 13:22
  • @AndrejsCainikovs -- It's your right to disagree. But it's not your right to be right when you're wrong. :) Apr 25, 2012 at 11:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.