My question may seem dumb, but, really, I want to think about it objectively.

Let's first say that I'm not expecting to hard overclock a computer (ie. doubling the clock of the CPU), but I'd go by successive steps.

Provided that:

  • My BIOS has a temperature guard that automatically shuts the system off (Crosshair 2 Formula), applied to CPU and chipset
  • My video card does the same (nVidia 8800GTX, expecting to buy a more recent one soon)
  • I don't know many other implications than overheating and instability

Is overclocking safe with modern hardware? Could an overclock and/or an associated overvoltage cause physical damage to hardware, when talking about 20% increments?

In general, with modern hardware, what temperature ranges be safely reached by components? I'm lucky that my CPU fan keeps the processor 40°C cold when strongly stressed (not overclocked). Can I expect a physical damage at 90°C in a chipset? Or a video card?

We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

  • Could someone explain who "we" are who are setting the below arbitrary rules? – Daniel R Hicks Aug 1 '12 at 22:07
  • For once I agree with the decision to close. – Daniel R Hicks Aug 1 '12 at 22:19
  • DanH: I think 20% is achievable and not very high overclock. Actually it's very realistic with today pc. – Gigamegs Aug 1 '12 at 22:40
  • @Chiyou: AMD and Intel grade their CPUs with certain clock speeds for a reason. – paradroid Aug 1 '12 at 23:14
  • 1
    Thanks for all the great answers, but... Does anyone have a bare idea about typical critical temperatures with modern hardware? I mean, "I knew all the theory"... Is 90°C risky. Or is it 60°C risky already? – usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ Aug 2 '12 at 15:19

Is overclocking safe with modern hardware?

Overclocking is safe, so long as you keep the processor's temperature and voltage within the manufacturer's specification. This is different for each CPU (or family of CPUs), so you will want to find the datasheet for your particular processor before changing anything.

Could an overclock and/or an associated overvoltage cause physical damage to hardware, when talking about 20% increments?

Software can physically damage hardware, and you do happen to set the CPU's clock speed and voltage in software. Given a mild overclock, however, there will be no immediate physical damage to the processor - but it should be noted that high clock speeds, temperatures, and voltages are all known to accelerate transistor aging.

This isn't something you can completely mitigate - even running the processor at the default clock speed and voltage will wear down the transistors over time. This is all on a timescale measured in years, and the effects can be mitigated by compensating the CPU's speed and voltage over time.

In general, with modern hardware, what temperature ranges be safely reached by components? I'm lucky that my CPU fan keeps the processor 40°C cold when strongly stressed (not overclocked). Can I expect a physical damage at 90°C in a chipset? Or a video card?

Again, check with the manufacturer's rated specifications. I've seen some GPUs that are rated up to 100C, while also encountering CPUs that can only withstand up to 68C. Indeed, the chip will work past it's rated temperature/voltage, but the lifespan will be severely impacted. In general, the cooler, the better.

So, what does this all mean? For those users who want to achieve a 20% overclock, if you're aware of the risks and are comfortable modifying your processor's clock speed and voltage, go for it. While it's impossible to quantify how much you would reduce the processor's lifespan, it's probably safe to assume that you wouldn't shorten it past it's useable life in your system (especially if Moore's law keeps going).

  • Fortunately, I haven't any cooling problems right now – usr-local-ΕΨΗΕΛΩΝ Aug 2 '12 at 17:00
  • 2
    > accelerate transistor aging. Even physical, plastic buttons, like on keyboards, are rated for a certain number of presses (often 1M or so) before they are expected to start experiencing failures, let alone tiny, electronic ones. Then of course there are flash cells that can be written only a certain number of times, and several other examples of things wearing out from overuse. So of course running a CPU faster will wear it out faster since its tiny switches are flipping much more often. – Synetech Aug 2 '12 at 18:25

Can overclocking really break hardware?

Yes it can as you are making your hardware run at speeds for which it is not designed.

Is overclocking safe with modern hardware?

Yes and No, it depends on how much you want to push your hardware, honestly answer to this question is subjective. Most modern processors these days come with builtin safety feature and shutdowns the computer to prevent damage when they reach or cross the max junction temperature. With proper safety measures like better cooling and carefully overclocking your hardware you can reap the benefits of overclocking. In real life scenario over a period of time, I have hardly noticed any major beneficial gains.

Could an overclock and/or an associated overvoltage cause physical damage to hardware, when talking about 20% increments?

Yes it can, read the last paragraph of this answer.

In general, with modern hardware, what temperature ranges be safely reached by components? I'm lucky that my CPU fan keeps the processor 40°C cold when strongly stressed (not overclocked). Can I expect a physical damage at 90°C in a chipset? Or a video card?

It depends on whether your hardware is designed to operate at temperature of 90C. It all depends on the operating temperature for which the hardware is designed. Industrial grade and military grade hardware are designed for higher operating temperature. So this means if your hardware is designed to operate at 100C then even if you reach 90C I don't think it will get damaged. From my experience the cooler the computer hardware runs better it is for us.

Overclocking Risks:

  1. Overheating of hardware
  2. Shorter lifespan of the hardware
  3. Damage to other hardware components. eg. Overclocking CPU can sometimes damage motherboard, RAM etc.
  4. Unstable performance.
  5. Void warranty. :P
  6. Increased cooling needs due increased power consumption

Additional info what other things happen when overclocking is done:

From Benefits And Risks : Overclocking Guide Part 1:

  • Speed - Integrated circuits have a finite lifespan: each operation deteriorates the circuit an infinitesimal amount, so that doubling the number of cycles per second could cut the circuit's life in half. This alone is not usually enough to "break" a component before it becomes outdated, but speed also contributes to heat.

  • Heat - Circuits deteriorate more quickly as temperatures rise. Heat is also an enemy of stability, so that low temperatures must be maintained to reach a component's highest stable speed.

  • Voltage - Increased voltage allows for greater signal strength, which can have a tremendous effect on how far a component can be pushed. But increased voltage also increases circuit deterioration, and is the leading cause of early failure. Increased voltage also increases heat, requiring additional cooling improvements.


When a manufacturer sells a part rated to work at a particular voltage or MHz, that means it has tested a statistically significant sample of a manufacturing run of the parts, and found that it works according to the MTBF, etc. they have specified and designed for.

Because they don't test every part of a run, you run the chance of getting a part that will work better than specified/designed, or worse than specified/designed.

Hardware wears out overtime, even if only very slightly. You are stressing the hardware more when you overclock it. It likely shortens the lifetime of the component even if you only overclock it a bit. However, you may luck out and end up with a part that can actually handle it for the expected duration you will use it for, due to variances in manufacturing. There is no way to reliably tell except by trying it.

@r.tanner.f is correct though. The safest thing to do is not to overclock.

  • Yes, and there was a time where processors were sold that were identical, save for the speed locked into them at the factory, and the price. I don't know if this still applies. – Nick Aug 1 '12 at 19:10
  • @Nick: This is still true. – bwDraco Aug 1 '12 at 19:18
  • @DragonLord, Well, it figures they have a name for it. Thanks. – Nick Aug 1 '12 at 19:27
  • On the note of 'chance of getting a part that will work better', the AMD processor I have was built with 4 cores, but only 3 enabled. The processor had a reputation for occasionally shipping with a perfectly good 4th core, but most times a core that failed tests and were knocked down to 3 cores so the product could still be sold. It did not perform well for overclocking, at all, and BSoD'd whenever I tried to unlock this fourth core. – Tanner Faulkner Aug 1 '12 at 20:09

Yes, overclocking can cause hardware damage. Damage from overclocking is generally due to electrical overstress resulting from the circuitry being subjected to excessive temperatures or voltages. Wikipedia explains this in more detail:

Electrical overstress

Most stress-related semiconductor failures are electrothermal in nature microscopically; locally increased temperatures can lead to immediate failure by melting or vaporising metallisation layers, melting the semiconductor or by changing structures. Diffusion and electromigration tend to be accelerated by high temperatures, shortening the lifetime of the device; damage to junctions not leading to immediate failure may manifest as altered current-voltage characteristics of the junctions.

In particular, electromigration can occur when a processor is operated at higher than normal voltages for extended periods of time, especially if it is not adequately cooled. This typically manifests itself as instability (system crashes, benchmark failures) that progressively worsens, eventually causing instability at even stock clock speeds. For chips made on a 14nm process, 1.35V is generally considered the maximum safe voltage for long-term operation, though slightly higher voltages are usually okay for brief periods of time.

Note that controlled overclocking with proper cooling can increase performance without causing an unacceptable reduction in hardware lifespan (what constitutes "unacceptable" depends on the user). Since overclocking involves pushing hardware beyond its tested limits, its performance and reliability cannot be guaranteed; as such, damage caused by overclocking is generally not covered under warranty.

  • Overclock doesn't damage the hardware. It's wrong overclock. Do you have proof? Do you overclock? – Gigamegs Aug 1 '12 at 20:07
  • @Chiyou: I did not say that overclocking will damage hardware. I said that it can damage hardware. – bwDraco Aug 1 '12 at 20:22
  • 2
    @Chiyou when OP is talking about 100% increases in clock speed and multiple 20% increases in voltage, it's irresponsible to tell him that overclocking won't harm his hardware and downvote people who tell him it can. What if someone visits this thread later with a simple mobo that doesn't have those kind of protections? – Tanner Faulkner Aug 1 '12 at 20:27
  • r.tanner.f: My mobo is a 3 power phase and it's the cheapest of the cheapest and I overclock it without any problem. Personally from my experience I really doubt that you can destroy your hardware. Of course my psu explodes but I wrote that in my answer, or didn't you read it? I also wrote when he plans to overclock he should read other source too because this site isn't the best for overclocking. – Gigamegs Aug 1 '12 at 20:41
  • @bwDraco thanks for offering more in-depth coverage of the science/theory. here's a link that backs you up talking about electromigration: electronics.stackexchange.com/a/38662/87201 – Trevor Boyd Smith Jul 23 '18 at 12:46

A thousand times yes, you could easily break your hardware. I have an AMD that will never be the same from just minimal overclocking because I didn't know what I was doing. =D (Hint: stock fans won't keep up...)

Overclocking isn't safe. If you're looking for safe, you should probably just skip it. The point at which things break can vary between processors, but there's extensive data around the Internet, and I'm sure the folks at any popular overclocking forum would be happy to walk you through your equipment and how you should proceed when you first experiment with overclocking, and what values and increments you should increase power. (I think 20% might be a little high, but I don't remember. I found quickly that overclocking isn't for me.)


Overclocking can overheat the hardware. Some CPUs will contain internal "protection" against overclocking (or will otherwise be self-limited) and won't be damaged, but others can indeed be damaged due to overheating -- the faster a circuit switches the more current it consumes and the hotter it gets -- simple physics.

And this is without even adjusting the voltage. Very often overclockers will raise some of the voltages on the circuit to make it run faster, and, given that power dissipation is V-squared over R, this causes the circuit to run MUCH hotter.

(And I can't "recommend a solution" because there's no problem to be "solved" -- this is simple physics, once again.)

(Of course, one can compensate to a degree by using a more effective heat sink, but the the "relief" provided that way is quite limited -- it's not a "solution", just a way to stretch things a little more.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.