I want to buy a wireless Bluetooth headset, but I am worried about the sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth. All other things being equal (e.g. the quality of the headphones themselves is the same), is there a noticeable impact on sound quality when it's connected via Bluetooth, compared to an analog audio jack? What about between the Bluetooth headset and a wired headset when the Bluetooth headset is wired (plugged into the jack)?

I am looking for knowledge about the pros and cons of Bluetooth audio and analog audio in terms of quality.

  • 16
    To reviewers: Instead of voting to close this question, please feel free to edit the question to remove the shopping recommendation. Look at my answer: there is a general, non-shopping lesson to be taught here about 3.5mm TRS vs. bluetooth audio. It's on-topic for SU when you take away the product comparison and talk about the underlying technologies. If anyone can reshape the question in that light, be my guest. But I'd recommend against voting to close. Aug 21, 2012 at 14:20
  • I recently bought a Bluetooth speaker and sound quality is noticeably worse than when using the jack. Also there is about half a second lag, which makes watching videos impossible (lips don't move in sync with speech). Of course this will depend on the codec and device, but overall I would advise against it.
    – Laurent
    Sep 1, 2013 at 13:32
  • This question is apparently about usage for listening to recorded music. Others usages where latency vs visual streams (ex: video conferencing, gaming) matters would give different answers.
    – dolmen
    Jul 21 at 10:30

1 Answer 1


Option 1: Bluetooth audio.

Option 2: 3.5mm TRS analog audio connector (wired).

Facts about Bluetooth:

  • Bluetooth audio protocol is lossy, meaning that some of the data is lost. However, it is digital, meaning that the audio reproduction in the headset is bit-exact the same data that was transmitted.
  • The data is encoded to a digital format that is compressed in a way that loses some of the source data (but hopefully not enough that you can perceive it); but the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering, which means that you are unlikely to notice even if some other electromagnetic frequency transmission interferes with your bluetooth (temporarily).
  • See A2DP at Wikipedia for more information about Bluetooth audio. To put it simply, there are more than one supported audio codec, and they have varying pros and cons in terms of bandwidth consumed, energy consumed, compatibility across devices, and quality. Some of the newer codecs such as apt-X produce what many consider to be superior audio quality, but device support is limited compared to the older codecs, or SBC which is required by the A2DP standard.

Facts about analog audio:

  • Analog audio over a standard 3.5mm headphone jack (technically called a "TRS" connector) can be very high quality if the audio playback device has a good DAC. An amplifier (separate or built-in) can make the signal sound even better.
  • A "good pair of cans" (good headphones) can sound amazing with this dated analog mode of transmitting audio down a cable. If you are using a very high quality DAC on the source audio device, chances are it's better than the DAC that has to be in the bluetooth headphones to convert the bluetooth digital data to analog, because the in-headphones DAC is limited by battery power and size constraints -- but a sound card in a computer is much less constrained. Even sound chips in smartphones are great these days.
  • All analog audio is subject to interference with the audio cable. Most audio cables are not shielded from external electromagnetic interference, and certain models of computers (especially Core 2 Duo era CPUs with on-board graphics) have been known to spew electromagnetic frequencies that are picked up as a "grinding" or "buzzing" noise on the analog headphone wire, if it is near enough to the computer. Some LCDs can do the same. Depending on your situation, this interference can be even worse than the loss of audio quality of bluetooth's lossy encoding.

The answer is that it heavily depends on your situation, and exactly how sensitive your headphones are, and exactly how good the Digital-Analog Converter (DAC) in the bluetooth headset is, and which codecs the bluetooth headset supports, and........ (many other things). If you're using the headphones in a way that a wire would get near certain models of LCD or computers, the analog signal quality may be terrible due to interference. If you're using the bluetooth in a way that it's in a heavily saturated 2.4 GHz environment (e.g. lots of WiFi signals, microwaves, cordless phones around), it may drop out due to heavy interference and crosstalk. Also you have to be able to live with the quality loss of lossy encoding for one of the bluetooth A2DP codecs, if you go that route. You probably can't detect it if you listen to lossy audio vs. lossless, but some people like to fake themselves out and say that they can tell ;)

  • 1
    +1 Nice answer and you skirted the "shopping" issue quite nicely
    – Dave M
    Aug 21, 2012 at 14:18
  • 2
    +1 For the good answer and you were able to turn the question into something useful for SU.
    – N_Lindz
    Aug 21, 2012 at 14:41
  • I've been trying to figure this out for a long time. Maybe this should be a separate question, but I have RF headphones that do 20-12000Hz and I stopped using them because the frequency response wasn't good enough. How do I select a set of bluetooth headphones that will sound as good as my analog ones do?
    – Joe
    Aug 27, 2012 at 19:09
  • 1
    With BlueTooth there are many quality differences between versions of the protocol. Also the construction of the mainboard is important, limiting the output by resistors and/or caps (limited bass reproduction) to increase battery life is bad for the richness of sound. I have done some test with several BlueTooth devices comparing to analog audio and differences in quality can be huge, some of them add hearable artifacts to the audio (result of compression). You can easily test it by playing compressed audio (mp3 for example). Another thing is delay (by buffering), visible when play a video
    – Codebeat
    Aug 2, 2016 at 13:18
  • 2
    Sorry but how can you argue as a benefit of Bluetooth that "the data stream is much more resilient to interruption, due to buffering" as an advantage over WIRED 3.5 mm AUDIO when it cannot be interrupted nor need to be buffered, as it is sent in continuous, analog form and not over the air? That's a nonsensic claim.
    – Pere
    Dec 19, 2016 at 21:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .