This question already has an answer here:

Is OS X Mountain Lion a pure UNIX-based OS?

Some tutorials say that it is a Unix-like OS, but after version 10.5, all Mac operating systems are based on pure UNIX.

Is this true?

marked as duplicate by James P, Kevin Panko, Carl B, nc4pk, Scott Dec 4 '13 at 1:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

up vote 2 down vote accepted

There's a lot of discussion on this topic, but as far as Apple's concerned, yes it's UNIX:

Open source UNIX foundation

  • POSIX-compliant, Open Brand UNIX 03 Registered Product
  • Open source kernel based on FreeBSD and Mach 3.0
  • 64-bit OS using LP64 data model
  • Support for multiple CPU and GPU cores via Grand Central Dispatch and OpenCL
  • Hand-tuned, standards-compliant scalar and vector math libraries

Standards-based networking

  • Complete IP-based architecture supporting IPv4, IPv6, and L2TP/IPSec VPN
  • Rich zero-configuration discovery and naming via Bonjour and Dynamic DNS
  • Interoperable file serving via NFS, AFP, SMB/CIFS, and FTP
  • Powerful Apache web services
  • Open Directory services built on LDAP and Kerberos for single sign-on

Comprehensive UNIX user environment

  • Standards-based graphics built on PDF (Quartz), OpenGL, and H.264 (QuickTime)
  • Full-screen terminal with xterm-256color support
  • Familiar UNIX/Linux utilities (such as emacs, vim, and bash)
  • Free Xcode developer tools based on Clang/LLVM

The UNIX trademark is owned by The Open Group, which basically uses it as a certification mark for SUS-compliance. OS X has been registered as a UNIX 03-compliant product since 10.5, so it qualifies as UNIX (not just UNX or Unix-like) in that sense. Most GNU/Linux distributions are not registered as SUS-compliant, so they should be called something like UNIX-like or UNX in that sense, even though neither of those terms is used by The Open Group.

OS X could also be considered to be genetic Unix in the sense that Darwin was based on FreeBSD (or it has used FreeBSD as a reference platform), and BSDs are usually considered to be genetic Unix, since the original BSD was based on AT&T code. Both GNU and Linux were rewritten from scratch though, so GNU/Linux platforms are not generally considered to be genetic Unix.

In a functional or spiritual sense, OS X is maybe less Unix (whatever that means) than platforms that are merely "Unix-like" in the first or second senses, but OS X could still considered to "be Unix" in all three senses.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.