I have a gray-scale image. I want to convert it into an transparent PNG, such that the black pixels (in the original image) become fully opaque, the white pixels become fully transparent, a 50% grey pixel would become 50% transparent, and so on for all the shades in between.

How can I achieve this?

(Yes, I know that this is almost the same question as Converting grayscale shades into alpha channel, but I want to know how to do this using only command line tools – e.g. ImageMagick or NetPBM.)

Here is a sample result from the above-mentioned question. This sample is a result which I would like to achieve using only command-line tools.


If you open this PNG in a viewer that support transparency, you'll see what I mean.

3 Answers 3


Ooookay. After plenty of googling, and reading for more of the ImageMagick manual than I actually care for, here's the answer. Given that you have a grayscale image called source.png, here are my commands.

To make the make the black pixels transparent and keeps the white pixels as they are, run this command:

 convert source.png -alpha copy -fx '#fff' result.png

To instead make the white pixels transparent while keeping the black as-is, use:

 convert source.png -alpha copy -channel alpha -negate +channel -fx '#000' result.png

Let's explain that last command a bit more thoroughly:

  • convert – Is the ImageMagic command (one of several)
  • source.png – The greyscale source image.
  • -alpha copy – Copy contents of the previous file into the alpha channel.
  • -channel alpha – Specify that following operators only should affect the alpha channel.
  • -negate – Invert the alpha channel (will, because of the previous -chanel alpha not affect any other part of the image).
  • +channel – Specify that following operators only should should affect the color channels, and no longer modify the alpha channel. (This is the default, and therefore we need not provide it in the first, simpler example.)
  • -fx '#000' – Replace color channel contents with black pixels. (Because of +channel the alpha channel will not be affected).

It is quite important to include that final -fx option, otherwise all semi-transparent pixels in generated image will retain colors. (Since these pixels are half-transparent, it might not be obvious, but the end result is not what one expect.)

I found the list of ImageMagick options quite useful.

  • pretty good explanation to achieve my goal, when I am using second command that make my image more darker than actual grayscale image. Actually, my aim to achieve same color tone which is there in grayscale other than that transparency is as expected. any Idea to achieve that? Sep 18, 2014 at 10:57
  • that's very useful, thanks! :) glad I didn't have to figure it out for myself May 16, 2015 at 15:35
  • I love you!!!!!!
    – mescarra
    Jun 10, 2016 at 12:49
  • 2
    not sure why, but with the current version (ImageMagick 7.0.7-21) I only get solid white/black image as a result, without any alpha channel. I copied the command line verbatim, changing only input/output file paths. Maybe they made some backwards-incompatible changes. Jan 30, 2018 at 10:01
  • 1
    …and I had better luck with -negate -alpha copy -channel rgb -fx '0', so if that works for everyone, perhaps it could be added to the answer Jan 30, 2018 at 10:23

With imagemagick 7, i find it's necessary to specify -channel RGB before the -fx, otherwise you get a solid black image, like so:

convert input.png -alpha copy -channel RGB -fx '#000' out.png

And negate is useful if the you want black to be opaque and white to be transparent:

convert input.png -negate -alpha copy -channel RGB -fx '#000' out.png

With ImageMagick 7.0, the above answer doesn't anymore. But you can use:

convert source.png -channel rgb -fx '#fff' result.png

Aka, fill the RGB channels with blank, and let the alpha as before.

  • I suspect you missed the '-alpha copy' :)
    – Chris
    Aug 12, 2019 at 6:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .