How do I manage to find all files in a directory and subdirectories and run a command on them?

For example,

find . -type f -name "*.txt" 

finds all txt files and:

find . -type f -name "*.txt" | gedit

sends it to gedit, but inside a text file. I want gedit to open all text files.

2 Answers 2


You can use the -exec flag to execute a command on each matching file:

$ find ./ -type f -name "*.txt" -exec gedit "{}" \;


The syntax is a bit strange (see -exec command ; in the manpages for more):

The string `{}' is replaced by the current file name being processed

You may also want to consider -execdir, which will do the same, but executes the command from the subdirectory containing the matched file (this is generally preferable).

  • 1
    Thanks. I see that it works. But what does the end ("{}" \:) means? execute list?
    – xyz
    Mar 14, 2013 at 21:18
  • 2
    The {} stands in for the current file name, and the semicolon is just terminating the command. The backslash and the surrounding quotes are just to prevent shell expansion.
    – David Cain
    Mar 14, 2013 at 21:20

find . -type f -name "*.txt" -print0 | xargs -0 gedit

  • Thanks. I see that it works. But what does the -print0 | xargs -0 part means?
    – xyz
    Mar 14, 2013 at 21:19
  • 1
    @xyz, you can read about the flags of any UNIX command using the man pages. Try man find or man xargs, then / to search for a given flag. The documentation is quite good, it should answer your questions.
    – David Cain
    Mar 14, 2013 at 21:21
  • 1
    -print0 prints a NULL character after each entry, -0 expects entries to be separated by NULL character. It is the safest way to handle tricky names.
    – Notinlist
    Mar 14, 2013 at 21:22
  • And isn't it a little bit strange that the syntax is not gedit xargs -0 instead of xargs -0 gedit. I see that the former doesn't work, but fail to see why.
    – xyz
    Mar 14, 2013 at 21:32
  • 3
    xargs is preferable to -exec for performance reasons since xargs can "batch up" a number of arguments before passing them to gedit. If one needed to run gedit against each file individually, replace '... -print0 | xargs -0 gedit' with '... -print0 | xargs -0 -i gedit {}' xargs is one of those commands like find and screen that you never know how you got along without a year after you learn about it.
    – arclight
    Apr 22, 2014 at 12:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.