I was wondering what would be the safest magnetic field for a hard drive so that the data inside it is safe and not wiped off?

For example I have a 2.1 home theatre system and when I take my android phone near it to check the magnetic field range it gives me a reading of 1000 micro Tesla. Would that be considered safe for a nearby hard disk?


2 Answers 2


First of all, to my understanding, Tesla measures the flux density of a magnetic field (or the magnetic field itself). Interesting in this context is the magnetic force required to affect another magnetic field. This force is measured in Oersted.

It has been explained to me there is a relation between the two forces. As in, a magnetic field will also have a demagnetizing effect on another magnetic field. However, calculating the demagnetizing force is non-trivial (for me).

This fear is usually completely unfounded unless you're still using floppy disks for storage or are handling extremely strong magnets. The latter would have an effect on all kinds of electronic devices though.

There are numerous articles about this. The gist of it is, magnets won't do anything to your hard drives.

enter image description here

However, there are devices which can have an effect on data stored on hard drive platters, degaussers. These devices seem to be operate at around 5000 to 9000 Oe.

So, if you've gotten yourself a Q-51-51-25-N, you might have an actual chance to clear data off the hard drive. But you're more likely to squish your hand in between the drive and the magnet or cause pyhsical damage to the hard drive.

To give you some context, we see the degaussers mentioned above operate at over 5000 Oe. Another storage media that is often considered to be affected by magnets are magnetic stripe cards. Generally, these are available in 2 variants, HiCo and LoCo (high-coercivity and low-coercivity). LoCo stripes are usually erased by magnetic forces as low as 300 Oe. Even those aren't common in practice any more (exactly because of this weakness). HiCo cards are often available with around 4000 Oe.

  • The OP (my friend) and I are interested in knowing how much minimum Oe or Tesla would cause even a couple of bits to flip in a hard-drive. I guess a couple of bits (more than the CRC can correct) would still be a problem, even if such a magnet doesn't completely wipe off the disk.
    – HRJ
    Mar 19, 2013 at 16:10
  • 1
    @HRJ: It's hard to pick a minimum, as it depends on the hard drive itself. Usually only a maximum is defined, a value at which it is safe to assume that no data is readable afterwards. In practice, a hard drive can (and does) lose bits without any magnets present. This is a problem often cited in the context of ZFS: permabit.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/… permabit.com/video/trouble-with-raid-4-5 Mar 19, 2013 at 16:19
  • 3
    @HRJ: I've just read through this table a bit. There's a ferrite magnet with a coercivity of ~2200 Oe. I'd say that's somewhere near the minimum to damage data on a hard drive. The table also shows the magnetic field with 0.4 T. You have measured 1000 µT. That's 1 mT or 0.001 T or 400 times less than that magnet. This is only relevant assuming there is a somewhat linear relation between the magnetic field and the coercivity. Mar 19, 2013 at 19:31
  • 2
    From Q-51-51-25-N website: We call this magnet THE DEATH MAGNET. I have no idea what you could reasonably do with this magnet - it is simply too intense for most applications. That sounds like my kind of magnet. ;P Mar 19, 2013 at 19:55
  • 6
    @OliverSalzburg Quoting one of the articles that you linked to: "Please note that this article describes our investigation about using magnets to completely erase data on a hard drive. It completely ignores the question of whether a strong magnet can DAMAGE a hard drive. These strong magnets certainly can damage a hard drive if brought close enough. Keep neodymium magnets away from good hard drives!"
    – HRJ
    Mar 20, 2013 at 4:48

I have been trying to find out what hard disk producers say about magnetic fields in the specification manuals.

To my surprise I found that hard disks specifications nowadays no longer include environmental specifications for external magnetic field.

For non-recent disks, dating from 10 years ago, I have found (and only for Hitachi) :

Given that hard disk technology has changed much in the last 10 years, I tried to google for experiments by destructively-minded end-users and found this thread dating from 2006 :

I tested this theory of HDD erasure and computer hardware sensitivity (not very scientifically, but effectively nonetheless) with an 80GB Maxtor 7200 RPM HDD that was in good working condition. I ran an 8 pound speaker magnet (from a large Cerwin Vega speaker) everywhich way that I could, around the HDD, then installed and tested the drive. I was surprised that it did exactly nothing at all.

The same could not be said for the monitor. It had to be degaussed immediately!!

My conclusion is that hard disks were vulnerable to such fields as emitted by your home theater system, but that was 10 years ago. Apparently, the much larger magnetic density of modern disks has also required better resistance to the much greater internal magnetic fields, therefore also to external ones.

But I would still take some precautions around your speakers, since even if the magnetic field is not strong enough to wipe the disk, it might possibly still corrupt some bits. Precautions are easy enough to take, as the strength of the field is reduced by the third power of the distance.

  • +50 for quoting the numbers. Thanks!
    – HRJ
    Apr 1, 2013 at 12:05

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.