I'm trying to set up dual/multiboot on an UEFI laptop that came with Windows 8 installed. I'd like to operate with Secure Boot enabled. I can install/configure OS'es with SecureBoot disabled (but I won't operate in CSM mode). I'm OK with blowing out Windows 8, but eventually the laptop will need Windows 8 Pro (x64) installed to support my Windows Phone development gear.

I've read through Microsoft's documentation on UEFI and partitioning at Windows and GPT FAQ. I'm not clear on how many EFI System Partitions (ESP) can be present on a disk. Since the UEFI can authorize access to a particular partition, I think the following holds:

  • Microsoft's platform key (PK) is loaded in UEFI
  • MS PK allows to access to Microsoft partitions
  • MS uses 4 partitions: ESP, MSR, Data, Recovery
  • Boot to MS when the Boot Option is selected (enforced by UEFI)

Above, ESP is UEFI System Partition; MSR is Microsoft System Reserved for additional non-preboot files and OEM files; Data is for customary OS files loaded by the loader; and Recovery is just value added OS stuff.

If I add a Linux operating system's platform key to the Platform Key (PK) database, then I believe I would need (at minimum):

  • Another ESP partition for booting/loading the Linux OS
  • Another Data partition for the customary Linux OS files

The additional ESP would be required because UEFI will need boot/loader files signed under the PK for the particular Boot Option; and UEFI will not allow access to Microsoft's partitions when booting Linux's OS.

How many EFI System Partitions (ESP) can a computer have? Is multi-ESP correct?


1 Answer 1


You're operating under the misapprehension that PKs are tied to ESPs; they aren't. The Secure Boot cryptographic features require that individual boot loader files be signed, but those files are stored on ordinary FAT filesystems that are themselves not signed, encrypted, or otherwise cryptographically interesting. A signed boot loader file can be moved from one partition to another and continue to work just fine, at least from a Secure Boot perspective. (Moving such a file may cause it to fail because it's been separated from critical configuration files or the like, of course, but that's another matter.)

To more directly answer the question, the EFI specification imposes no limit on the number of ESPs that may be present on a computer or on a hard disk; you could have dozens of them if you wanted to, and that would be fine from the EFI's perspective. Unfortunately, Microsoft is not so flexible; Windows officially supports just one ESP per disk (maybe per computer; I'm a bit foggy on that detail). I don't know about Windows 8, but the Windows 7 installer will flake out if it sees more than one ESP on a disk; the installation will proceed part of the way and then fail. (At least, that's what it's done in my tests.) That said, if you create a second ESP after installing Windows, Windows will continue to boot and operate correctly, at least as far as I've seen. (I can't promise that it won't misbehave if you use some particular feature, though.)

Overall, then, in a multi-boot environment, I recommend restricting yourself to one ESP. I also recommend making it rather large -- 550MiB is my usual recommendation, for assorted technical reasons having to do with rare bugs and FAT sizes. That said, if you've got an existing installation with a smaller ESP, it's probably fine to just stick with it. In either case, Linux and Windows can share a single ESP just fine. I do, however, recommend backing it up early and often -- definitely back it up before installing a new OS. Because the ESP holds your boot loaders, an accidental erasure of it will render your computer unbootable.

  • Thanks Rod. "You're operating under the misapprehension that PKs are tied to ESPs". Microsoft states "Access to a partition is controlled by the system firmware before the system boots the operating system". How can the firmware limit access to a partition for a Boot Option if not by a particular Platform Key? I understand signing, but how about if PK1, PK2, etc are used as a principal in a simple ACL (I'm trying to figure out how the authz subsystem works here).
    – jww
    Dec 15, 2013 at 18:41
  • 4
    Regarding the quote that "access to a partition is controlled by the system firmware," you're over-interpreting. That doesn't refer to cryptographic controls, but to the fact that the EFI provides drivers to give EFI programs access to partitions. Microsoft does say that it supports just one ESP. For instance, here: "Q: Can there be two ESPs on a single disk? A: Such a configuration should not be created and is not supported in Windows."
    – Rod Smith
    Dec 15, 2013 at 20:16
  • 1
    @ThorstenSchöning, the page you reference does not address the number of ESPs that are permitted on a computer or hard disk, just the distinction between an ESP and non-ESP FAT partitions and how the EFI discovers and uses partitions generally. What's more, that post is somebody's interpretation of the EFI specification (as is my answer here). If you wish to challenge my claim that the EFI specification does not limit the number of ESPs, please reference the part of the EFI specification that does so. If such a limit is in the EFI specification, quoting it is an easy refutation of my claim.
    – Rod Smith
    Aug 28, 2021 at 14:55
  • 1
    No, @ThorstenSchöning, the link you provided is not the EFI spec and does not explicitly say that the number of ESPs is limited. The EFI spec itself, the last time I checked, did not say anything explicit about the number of ESPs permitted on a disk or on a computer. Your claim that I need to prove this is backwards. My claim is that this information is not present in the document, which is impossible to prove except by quoting the whole document. Your claim, OTOH, that there is an explicit limit in the EFI spec is easily demonstrated, if true; just quote or reference the passage.
    – Rod Smith
    Aug 30, 2021 at 14:41
  • 1
    @ThorstenSchöning, the 13.3.3 section you yourself quote is quite explicit that the EFI spec does not impose a limit on the number of ESPs on a computer. The use of the word "the" preceding "System partition" is extraordinarily weak evidence to the contrary; you have to read a lot into the use of the word "the" to draw an inference contradicting what is explicitly stated elsewhere. The explicit statement easily trumps such an inference. References to multiple "conforming FAT partitions" are irrelevant to the discussion.
    – Rod Smith
    Sep 1, 2021 at 13:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .