2

Below is a typical combobox before it is opened (It is next to where it says "Destination Folder"): combobox before

Below is what it looks like when it is opened: combobox after, default

I HAAAATE this behaviour. It assumes what I am looking for is more likely to be close in the list to what was there when I opened the combobox (which is never the case by the way). So, it positions the list with the last item underneath the mouse. But that puts the top of the list off-screen, so if the item I am looking for is at the top, I have to move my mouse up to the top to scroll the list down so I can see all of the items in the list before I can pick it. Below is what I want it to look like, right after I open the box:

combobox after, desired

Now, I can see all items immediately, and I can select the one I want without having to do any awkward scrolling manoeuvres. Incidentally, this is how windows does it. Sometimes, they get it right.

How can I change GTK's settings to make it do that by default?

2
  • You're assuming it's a setting. It looks a bit more like a GtkComboBox bug to me.
    – user1686
    Jun 3 '14 at 11:21
  • It's not a bug. It is the behaviour the makers desired. Like I said in the OP, the reason they did it this way was because they thought items close to the one last selected are more likely to be the next item selected. This is never true, though. Typically, all items are equally likely to be selected next. Even though this behaviour is demonstrably a bad idea, if my experience has taught me anything, it will be impossible to convince them otherwise. Of course, there might not be a setting either. If there isn't one, I would consider that a bug. Jun 3 '14 at 11:30
0

You can't. Offsetting the menu so that the active item appears over the button is done in the library's C code, unconditionally.

I imagine there is already a bug on Bugzilla for this, but you could of course file a request for a setting/consideration of change if not.

Anyway, it's best to search for previous design discussions first, as I imagine this is not the first one. That is: even if there is not a bug, they might have recently said that they're fine with how it works.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.