0

Installing an OS on a SSD then using it inside a another machine w/ different hardware? For Linux, is is a problem with drivers or other issues? Does CoreOS or Ubuntu automatically take of any differences in hardware? Is it recommended to stay away from this procedure?

closed as unclear what you're asking by Ramhound, Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Matthew Williams, Nifle, DavidPostill Oct 28 '14 at 14:43

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • The question is asking about the portability of an installed [Linux] OS between differing hardware platforms. In the same way that a Mac Boot HDD can (usually) be moved from one machine to another, and that a Windows boot HDD can (usually) not. The SSD reference is irrelevant. Generally the answer is down to whether a "complete" set of drivers are installed or not, and how consistent the hardware platform is. – Greenonline Feb 10 '15 at 0:51
1

Yes this is generally not a good thing to do as you said it will have a problem with the drivers along other issues, but the default motherboard hardware should overide the settings at best.

  • Thanks for your answer. Just to clarify, what do you mean by "the default motherboard hardware should overide the settings at best"? – Steve Oct 6 '14 at 15:29
  • i.e. the on-board graphics/sound built into the motherboard. If the computer does not recognise the current hardware it defaults to using the on-board hardware on the motherboard itself. – DarkEvE Oct 6 '14 at 15:31

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.