1

I was redirected to SU from network engineering because of this question:

I want to build a long range wireless network. I would connect from point A (has connection with internet and router) to point B (connects via long range and receives the connection). Air distance between A and B is ~ 1 km.

So would be using a 5 GHz wrong as 2,4 GHz is better for long ranges? (According to this source the disadvantage of 5GHz is the long range but yet many people are using it ) LINK

As an beginner, I have many questions, but lets just solve the main questions.

What is the "must-have" equipment in this scenario except my home modem/router for accessing the internet and antennas for transmitting?

Many sources mention Ubiquiti/Mikrotik. What is the difference between them?

1
  • I don't know if wifi devices are capable of working over such long ranges. But the thing is that the higher the frequency, the shorter the range, so 5GHz wouldn't be a good candidate for this.
    – phuclv
    Jun 23, 2015 at 6:16

1 Answer 1

1

The must haves are: * An access point and access point client (many devices can act as either), along with a couple of directional antennas.
* You also need line of sight between the 2 sites (note that there should be a reasonable margin with line of site, ie you should be able to see above, below and both sides and have space to spare - look at fresnel clearance if you care for the specifics). * Mounting equipment. * An environment without too much wireless noise (easy to say, harder to do).

Ubiquity and Mikrotik are both good brands - ISP/Prosumer gear. I associate Microtik more closely with routers and Ubiquity more closely with Wifi devices - but this may be subjective. I've not used Mikrotic devices before, but I've been absolutely stoked with my Ubiquity AP - which far surpassed my expectations in terms of performance for a very low price.

You might or might not need a signal amplifier - but be careful with these as they can transmit past the limit - you are often better off with more expensive and more directional aerials.

A 1k line of site shot is easily doable (you could probably even use a "cantenna" if there is not much noise in your environment.

The lower the frequency the farther the signal will go, but the slower the speed/less channels.

The newer the standard the greater the range. An 802.11n device will perform 2-4 times as well as an 802.11g device, all else being equal. 802.11ac will give better throughput but probably not much more range.

if you don't already know, its important to understand that the more directional the aerials, the further the signal will travel but the harder they will be to line up. Highly directional aerials are also likely to pick up less noise (but this will depend on your environment).

The 5 gig band is a lot less crowded but does not go as far. If you are in a built up area its probably a better bet. In the country, 2.4 gig is great. If you don't have excellent line of site, lower frequencies are better.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .