22

If I enable to turn off hard disk when inactive in Windows Power Plan - Advanced Settings, will it also stop my downloads in different programs? Currently my Internet connection is slow.

2 Answers 2

38

No. When any program (download or not) requests disk access, the disk is no longer inactive, therefore Windows wakes up the disk.

2
  • Expected "simple" at the end of the answer :)
    – Krish
    Sep 11, 2015 at 6:18
  • And that is why, in practice, you will likely never see the OS disk spin down - even when, seemingly, nothing is running. There are plenty of background services/processes that continuously read/write (even if just small amounts) and this will keep the drive awake day and night ;-)
    – misha256
    Sep 14, 2015 at 20:19
9

Functionally, this setting is useless when the computer only has one hard drive. Windows will not spin down the OS drive unless the whole machine is going to sleep.

12
  • Except if you are running Windows 95 by any chance. I cannot comment on newer versions.
    – musiKk
    Sep 10, 2015 at 19:40
  • 2
    No reference; just personal experience. I work with computers for a living and I have never been able to get Windows to spin down the primary OS drive. I don't know if this is by design or if it's a consequence of access patterns, but if you set the spin-down time to 1 minute, disable all other power management features, and then let the machine sit idle, the drive never spins down.
    – Wes Sayeed
    Sep 10, 2015 at 21:29
  • 1
    From personal experience, the OS drive spun down, and restarted when there was I/O activity, on Windows 98 and 98SE. I also can't comment on newer versions of Windows.
    – alephzero
    Sep 10, 2015 at 22:34
  • 2
    @alephzero Can confirm this also was true in Windows 3.1. Source: me, who once tweaked 3.1 to to power down the hard drive maximum battery life on the last B&W laptop made by caching a minimum set of DLLs so disk wouldn't be touched until I hit "save".
    – Michael
    Sep 10, 2015 at 23:08
  • 1
    @netniV there's no reason why "doing stuff", especially when the user isn't actively at the machine, should result in frequent disk access. Nearly all reads done by a long-running background app should be served from cache, and writes can be deferred until the disk needs to be spun up anyway for a read, or memory pressure forces a page cache eviction.
    – hobbs
    Sep 11, 2015 at 2:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.