1

I've always used Nero in previous Windows versions. Do I still need it (or some other program) in Windows 7, or is the built-in burning software (whatever it might be) good enough?

Improve this question

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
3

No

But personally I recommend IMGburn

Improve this answer
3
  • I did not get that from that thread. Having burned a Linux ISO to CD just last night on Windows 7, I would dispute that statement.
    – kmarsh
    Jan 22, 2010 at 13:19
  • I've misread the question! Edited the question
    – Ivo Flipse
    Jan 22, 2010 at 13:25
  • +1 for ImgBurn. It's simple, well-written, and has a decent feature set for dealing with disk images.
    – Collin Allen
    Jan 22, 2010 at 19:04
0

In windows 7 , we can do almost every thing we commonly doing in nero. But it lacks virtual device mounting feature.Expecting that feature in coming service pack.

Improve this answer
2
  • 1
    Quite controversial feature in the gaming sector, they wouldn't put such a thing without having pressure from lot of big firms. Plenty of games protections are scanning and refusing to launch if such a virtual device is detected. So I don't really see Microsoft putting that as a pre-installed feature.
    – Gnoupi
    Jan 22, 2010 at 13:31
  • @Gnoupi You Are right.Its just a hope.
    – cdb
    Jan 23, 2010 at 4:29
0

Given that I had bad experience in the past with the burning engines in Windows, I recommend using Nero. Nero includes an explicit complete verification of everything that has been burned to confirm that your data indeed was properly burned. This is also a reason why I use it under Linux as well.

Although Nero costs some money, if you use it for backups or important data, the cost of the software is well covered by the value of the data you may burn.

Improve this answer
0

I prefer Nero Essentials / Infra Recorder for Win7...Both ot them are free...

Improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .